You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The question is not, "Is Ann Coulter a hate-filled bitch." [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:34 PM
Original message
The question is not, "Is Ann Coulter a hate-filled bitch."
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 08:38 PM by Plaid Adder
I think that goes without saying. The question is: why does she still get air time?

The only reason she goes around saying this shit is that it gets her on the talk shows and sells books. Her books get more heinous and more outrageous because shock value is the only thing she has to sell. She can't construct a coherent argument, she can't have a real conversation, and she really can't write very well. The only thing that distinguishes her from a million other right-wing morons is that she's willing to say in public under her own name what they will only post under aliases at Free Republic. Because she has no shame, no sense of compassion, and no interest in the consequences of her hatemongering, she's willing to say things that anyone else, regardless of political affiliation, could never physically utter because as soon as they tried they would die of shame. So that's her brand. Hateful shit you won't find any other human being willing to say in print. She and Fred Phelps are basically selling the same product, but she's more successful, perhaps because she looks slightly better in a dress.

Fine, she's an asshole, whatever. My question is: why is anyone still giving her a platform? Sure, she has a right to her opinion and to say whatever she wants; but nowhere in the Constitution does it specify that she has the right to be paid to do it. How insane does she have to get before people stop bringing her onto their talk show sets and letting her spew? What's the justification? As far as I can tell she has no credentials and nothing constructive to say. Based on her interview with Matt Laurer, it also appears that she literally cannot answer a simple question unless it relates directly to herself. So in what sense is she an appropriate guest for a talk show?

I'm not even going to ask what her publishers are thinking. Her publishers are thinking they can make money flogging her crap, and that's all they care about. I hope they'll lose money on this one; maybe it would spare us the next.

There's not much point to hanging around here talking about how pissed off we are at Ann Coulter. It's her job to piss you off. There would be some point to writing to whatever media outlet you saw her on this morning to ask what in the world they were thinking when they invited her on, and whether they and their sponsors really want to be associated with this kind of sleaze.

I'm just sayin',

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC