You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: You mean the OP, posted by reprehensor? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
37. You mean the OP, posted by reprehensor?
And you are aware that reprehensor has posted an article written by another individual?

muddying the waters with other topics is another "good" technique.

Lumping five wide-ranging topics together that each occur under different circumstances, and have many points to be considered each on their own, do not a cohesive ideology make. if you're looking for "lockstep", you're not going to find it at DU, or with the Democrats, for that matter.

What precisely do you find so "smart" about Cocoa's post? autorank has long used caps and colored letters in his own posts, no matter the topic. Do bold letters in a headline always constitute yelling? They are emphasis, they are meant to denote importance and command attention.

Why is it suddenly today construed as yelling?

And as for the other bit of "smart" why shouldn't some tit for tat be part of the argument, considering the condescension and insult that has faced the Election reform movement from the first question about 2004, right up to this day. That's how human beings communicate at times after a year or so of personalized crapola flung their way. Not noble, but that's the way it fucking goes.

So maybe to some, the evidence will finally "become evidence" when enough people look at it and AGREE that it is. It's already happening. That's the nature of reality.

It's difficult to argue with how people view reality, or even choose--for whatever purpose--to view reality. It's best to move forward with that which we DO agree with, rather than endlessly harping on the same personal pet peeve in every post, imagining that if only someone listens to us the movement will take off like a bat out of hell.

Well, the reality is that it is moving. and it will continue to move in the direction of the truth and Democracy despite my--or anyone else's--personal wounds, imagined or real, be they from sincerely unfortune misunderstanding, or purposeful quashing.

If you feel that it's a flame-bait thread, you are free to hit the alert button and explain why you perceive it as such.

As I say, I'm moving on...as of right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC