Reply #89: Sure, they could have sources [View All]

Then again, they might not have sources.

Or their source might be a pink elephant in a tutu. Prove to me that's not true.

I have no clue.
This is why we depend on news sources to give us facts, and sadly TO has spun us with several stories that factually were inconsistent, to being inaccurate, to being unprovable. News articles are not rumors, and until a story can be substantiated, it is still a rumor.

Rove hasn't been indicted, there is no proof an indictment exists, nobody has come on record, no target letter has been produced.

The only evidence we have here is that Rove is a free man, and Luskin denies the existence of a target letter or an indictment.

Maybe you'd say he's lying and maybe he is, but I have no proof of that either.

These are the facts I have at this point, which leads me to believe TO's story doesn't hold water, and might have been a complete fabrication. I can come to no other conclusion without facts that say otherwise.