"There is no anti-circumcision crowd" You know that is a huge load of dung.
For someone who claims to only be interested in "facts", you llove to ignore the motivations of these and many other "researchers", and the history of their advocacy for circumcision in the past. Many of these doctors advocated circumcision long before they conducted this study.
The latest study, touted by the NYT, has been questioned on ethics, becsause they denied the uncurcumcised control group condoms. The circumcised group were all newly circumcised as well. No wonder they stopped the study early. Those newly circ'd men could not have had sex, sinc they were still convalescing. They got the results they wanted, stopped the study, mmade up some bullshit about "ethical ramificatiuons of continuing" and published it, claiming it as a "Virtual Cure" If this is true, that they denied the use of condoms to anyone, they are cold blooded killers, and should not be anywhere near health policy of any continent.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/331/7519/781
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore