You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: Laws for sale - Republicans in Congress let lobbyists write laws (Gareth Cook) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Laws for sale - Republicans in Congress let lobbyists write laws (Gareth Cook)
Problems we've always had, but in recent times, elected leaders who really want to do something about them are rare. From 1995:



Laws for sale - Republicans in Congress let lobbyists write laws

Gareth Cook
Washington Monthly July-August, 1995

Washington state's Republican Senator Slade Gorton was as eager as a six-year-old with a brand-new toy. The draft for a new Endangered Species Act had just been completed, and he wanted to introduce it on the floor of the Senate as soon as possible. But one Gorton aide advised caution. "It is important," she wrote in a memo, "that we have a better than adequate understanding of the bill prior to introduction.... The coalitions should have a section by section general summary of the draft bill together today."

The "coalitions" the aide referred to were a collection of industry groups--most notably paper and timber companies--that had much to gain from eviscerating the Act's protections. The reason the coalitions had the knowledge to provide summaries--and the reason the Senator did not have "a better than adequate understanding" of the bill--was that Gorton, who had received hefty campaign contributions from the coalitions, simply let them draft the new legislation themselves.

Such stories are becoming commonplace on Capitol Hill, prompting many to ask whether the Republicans are indeed living up to their promises. If the Republicans had a central message in the 1994 elections, it was this nugget of quasi-populism: It's time to throw the bums out and change the way Washington conducts its business. This broad-ranging philosophy, much more than the individual items of the Contract With America, was the GOP's true mandate. Polls show that most voters were not even familiar with the Contract's details. Rather, many were energized by the sense that Republicans would break through the partisan dams and challenge Washington's entrenched elite.

Even liberal commentators seemed ready to admit that the Republicans were delivering: congressional staff cut by a third; useless committees dropped; a legislative checklist completed. It is hard to recall a time when "Accountability" and "Responsibility," earnestly capitalized, were such popular words on Capitol Hill. Finally, proclaimed Republicans, the very culture of Washington was being changed.

But the Republicans' work on one of their top legislative priorities--the reform of government regulation--tells a very different story. From behind the Capitol's closed doors emerges a portrait of everything voters hate about Washington: special interests laying down fat campaign contributions to gain a Congressman's ear and, at times, his pen.

CONTINUED...

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_n7-8_v27/ai_17263138



Thanks for the kind words, bobbolink. Thanks also for giving a damn and being one of those who knows what needs to be done and is willing to do something about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC