You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Did you post that source as a joke? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Did you post that source as a joke?
From your source:

I decided to try a different approach to see what I came up with, and I came across an amazing statistic. At first I was sure I had made an error. In 1982, Saudi Arabia stopped allowing their oil and gas data to be scrutinized. Prior to that, outsiders had some access to information on their reserves. When that accessibility was shut down, Saudi proven oil reserves were estimated to be 164.60 billion barrels. I have yet to find a challenge to this number. It seems to be accepted that this number does represent their reserves in 1982. However, in 1990 they mysteriously raised their reserve estimate by 90 billion barrels. Since the data are now hidden from public view, there is obviously a great deal of skepticism regarding this new estimate.

So, I started with the assumption that the 1982 estimate of 164.60 billion barrels was correct, and then I just subtracted Saudi production since then. I calculated their total production since 1982 as 69 billion barrels, leaving 95 billion barrels of reserves. This approach would imply either that their 1982 reserves were overstated, or that the models showing Saudi Arabia at 70 billion barrels remaining are in error. (If anyone can find a challenge to the 1982 number, I would appreciate the reference).

But, we know that reserves sometimes legitimately grow, and new discoveries take place. So, I decided to check this approach against what happened in the U.S. over the same time period. I examined U.S. reserves and production from 1982 to 2006. The following data are all pulled from:

U.S. Crude Oil Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production

In 1982, U.S. reserves were 27.858 billion barrels. In 2005, U.S. reserves were 21.757 billion barrels. So we drew down our reserves by 6 billion barrels. Imagine my shock to discover our production over that time period. What would you guess? Six billion barrels? Ten? In fact, oil production from these reserves since 1982 totals 56.9 billion barrels! Amazingly, in the past 24 years we have produced 57 billion barrels of oil and pulled our reserves down by only 6 billion barrels. That seems incredible, but it appears that this is what has happened.

So, the conclusion is that the method I tried to apply to Saudi reserves was falsified when I applied it to U.S. reserves, but I was surprised at the amount of oil produced by the U.S. since 1982. So I still don't have a clue as to how much oil Saudi Arabia actually has. If their reserves followed similar behavior to U.S. reserves, then they could still be sitting on > 150 billion barrels.

http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/12/12/21114/589#more

So you select a source that admits that he has no clue as to how much oil Saudi Arabia actually has. Is that the figure that you suggest be reported by the Energy Information Administration, "NO CLUE"?

You post a source that can't even get the year right for when Saudi Arabia increased it oil reserves?

Be serious.

Should I interpret your lack of comment regarding Iranian oil revenues as an acknowledgment that they are increasing?

- Make7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC