You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #51: Simply not true.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-31-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #42
51. Simply not true..
Edited on Sun Dec-31-06 11:18 AM by sendero
... I believed Hans Blix and Scott Ritter. There was plenty of evidence, plus garden-variety common sense that indicated that Saddam could not possibly have hidden any significant weapons program from the inspection teams, nor could he have had much of a means to develop such programs while his country was virtually under siege from sanctions, flyovers, and everything else we could throw at them.

You had to be some kind of True Believer to think Saddam had any serious weapons, and that is a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC