You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #55: Waxman knew the rules; Issa needed remind about "point of clarification for the record" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
garthranzz Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
55. Waxman knew the rules; Issa needed remind about "point of clarification for the record"
Here's what I think is the relevant section from Robert's Rules of Order, which is the basis for the House Rules.

For points of inquiry or information, answer the question, redirect it to the member who had the floor, or invite the membership to answer that question only. "Can anyone respond to Mr./Ms. Z's question regarding (such-and- such)?" Do not permit debate or extraneous information to enter into the response. Try to limit, or at least to moderate, requests for further clarifications, to prevent the issue from being muddled.
For a point of order, rule on it immediately, possibly seeking the counsel of others. If you are completely unsure, it is in order to put the member's point before the Society. The latter recourse is undebatable; restate the point, and ask for those in favor of the interpretation as expressed in the point of order, and for those opposed. A simple majority carries.


Issa (I - is a ass) raised a point of order, based on the Five Minute Rule (see below). Waxman said he was asking the Jerk Johnson for clarification - a Point of Inquiry - which apparently take precedence over the five minute rule, at the chair's discretion. From Rule 14 below: ". Until all such requests have been satisfied, the chairman shall, so far as practicable, recognize alternately" - Waxman was relying on the "so far as practicable" provision and the priority of a point of inquiry/clarification.

SO INDEED HE WAS FOLLOWING PROCEDURE CORRECTLY AND WITHIN HIS DISCRETION

Committee Rules and Jurisdiction

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is the main investigative committee in the U.S. House of Representatives. It has authority to investigate the subjects within the Committee’s legislative jurisdiction as well as “any matter” within the jurisdiction of the other standing House Committees.

Rule 14 -- Five-Minute Rule
(a) A Committee member may question a witness only when recognized by the chairman for that purpose. In accordance with House Rule XI, clause 2(j)(2), each Committee member may request up to five minutes to question a witness until each member who so desires has had such opportunity. Until all such requests have been satisfied, the chairman shall, so far as practicable, recognize alternately based on seniority of those majority and minority members present at the time the hearing was called to order and others based on their arrival at the hearing. After that, additional time may be extended at the direction of the chairman.

From Rules of the House

Sec. 6 . The Chairman's Role

The powers and duties of the full committee chairmen are derived
from custom and from the rules of the House. The chairman of a
committee:

<box> Presides over committee meetings. Manual Sec. 317.
<box> Administers oaths to witnesses in hearings in the committee or
delegates that authority. Manual Sec. 805; 2 USC Sec. 191. In
one instance, the chairman of an investigating committee
administered the oath to himself and testified. 3 Hinds
Sec. 1821.
<box> May punish breaches of order and decorum by censure and
exclusion from hearings. Manual Sec. 803.

More from the House rules:
(2)(A) Subject to subdivisions (B) and (C), each committee shall apply
the five-minute rule in the interrogation of witnesses in any hearing
until such time as each member of the committee who so desires has had
an opportunity to question each witness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC