The study showed that Fox News reports on the Iraq occupation far less than other news stations. O'Reilly reframes it as all other stations just trying to embarass Bush. Then his defender on Scarborough expands on that by saying that MSNBC isn't reporting the good news, just the bad news in Iraq. MSNBC falls for it and defends themselves.
What the response should have been was 'Why isn't Fox News reporting the good news from Iraq?' If most of the news is good then Fox News should be reporting more (not less) about Iraq than the stations they claim only want to embarass the president by reporting the bad news.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(202 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
