You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #128: We were speaking specifically of Bush's "election"/ [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

EFerrari

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-04-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #126

128. We were speaking specifically of Bush's "election"/

There is no evidence that Mr. Bush has ever won a national election, regardless of the fact that he was seated. Had he won, the Supreme Court wouldn't have had to interfere on his behalf in 2000, and had he won in 2004, there would have been no basis for a recount in Ohio -- a recount which was tampered with and which has resulted in several indictments.

So, no, it's not silly at all. You seem to trust officialdom a great deal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.