2. No, we definitely do not need him at the bar. I couldn't resist visiting his site.
Here's an excerpt where he incorrectly assumed intent by the "Defendants" and upon which assumption he would drop his suit:
"2. Defendants removal of the question is assurance that all future examinees taking the Massachusetts Bar Examination will not be forced to accept, support or promote a liberal ideology on a professional licensing examination. There is another forum for that contemporary social issue and the Massachusetts Bar Examination is not an appropriate forum for that debate, especially considering the fact that Defendants have ignored the imprimatur of the people and the democratic process in enacting and legalizing gay marriage in the State of Massachusetts."
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
