26. Then it's also a LIE to assert that just refusing a funding request
would automatically cause Bush to end his occupation and withdraw. It's an unproven assertion.
If Democrats did manage to adopt the 'no vote' approach, they would have absolutely NO control over what Bush would do next to maintain his deployment. They have absolutely NO control over where the shortfalls would occur. Who knows how Bush would respond?
That's why some think it's imperative that there be some legislation which mandates a withdraw by the force of law. That's not propaganda, it's a different point of view.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
