You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: Au contraire, I do expect my government to make it happen. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Au contraire, I do expect my government to make it happen.
Edited on Sun Sep-30-07 05:42 AM by Lasher
And I am not alone in harboring this sentiment. According to a recent Rasmussen Reports survey, Forty-four percent (44%) of American adults say that health care services should be made available for free to all Americans. It found that 39% disagree and 17% are not sure.

Regardless, you can not dismiss an argument in favor of single-payer UHC by claiming it is unlikely that it will ever come about. Single-payer poses a threat to the stakeholders in the present system, and therefore is opposed by interests vested in the status quo. But our discussion should focus on which of the policy alternatives best serves the public interest.

This is not all about "...improving the healthcare crisis by governing the existing health care industry." That is part, but not all, of the debate. I'm going to guess that by this you mean the existing health care insurance industry. Am I correct? This is an important distinction because I am certainly not endorsing any change in the way doctors and hospitals operate today, except for a significant reduction in their overhead costs that are currently brought about by interaction with private healthcare insurance providers.

Therefore it is misleading to claim that there's no gurantee "government healthcare" would be more efficient than "private healthcare". With single-payer, just as with Medicare Parts A & B today, healthcare would be very much in the private sector. The government would just pay the bills.

And there is a wealth of evidence that indicates single-payer UHC would be much more efficient. Please consider the following graphic that shows Canada is spending half as much per capita as we are. Everybody there is covered. Their infant mortality rate is lower and their life expectancy is higher.



Since you seem unconvinced by the resource I previously supplied, here is a link to a website that provides results from a wealth of studies which all confirm huge saviings would be realized by changing to a single payer system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC