You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #102: Huh. I don't recall that one being in the United States Code. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Rhythm and Blue

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-22-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #96

102. Huh. I don't recall that one being in the United States Code.

Perhaps you could tell me where Disassembling the Substance of the United States (I assume you meant Constitution here, but FYI, USC is generally taken as US Code) appears.

Since Richard Cheney is not actually taking Wite-Out and Sharpies to the Constitution, I would have to suggest that what you propose would be so vague that absolutely any attempt to expand the mandate of an office or agency beyond its limits would have to be considered as treason, down to the EPA enforcing emissions standards in a manner that Congress finds unreasonable. That would be stupid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.