You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #27: Yeah, this is why they had to even further rig the process... [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

JackRiddler

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-05-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #24

27. Yeah, this is why they had to even further rig the process...

Not that Jackson could have won the general, but this shows that even as late as 1988 the process of fixing elections to make sure that only reliable corporatist non-entities win still had kinks.

But it's never been more rigged than today, eh?

Used to be if you came in fourth in Iowa, you were called dark horse and had a shot to win some states.

Now if you come in second, everyone howls: Why are you still in it? Hurry up and get out for unity!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.