|
The attorney was instructed, out of the jury's presence, that the evidence was inadmissable, so I don't think the jury even knows whether it is or is not, or its significance, and they were not given a limiting instruction or told to strike it.
But IMO it was a direct and obvious attempt to introduce evidence into the record, by one party, in spite of six hearings that instructed him to not introduce this evidence before the jury.
Also, it came out of the blue, by a witness not qualified, particularly, to testify on this issue of fact.
Thank you very much for your opinion on this matter. I have learned so much from the legal-eagles here on DU.
You people are awesome and informative.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore