You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #111: A patch. Right, that was it. Thanks
[View All]
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-04-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #106 |
| 111. A patch. Right, that was it. Thanks |
|
I'm remembering more aboout that show now. I think one of the scientists who originally concluded it was a fraud due to carbon testing was contacted by another one with an alternative explanation and they colaborated on a reassesment and concluded that the earlier test was in fact inconclusive, and further tests as you describe would be needed in order to be definitive.
I hadn't heard of the conclusion by some scientists that paint figments were the cause of the image, which is linked to on this thread. The ones I was aware of remained perplexed.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread