You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Wikileaks Incident: How Social Media has Changed Warfare Coverage - HuffPo [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 01:06 PM
Original message
The Wikileaks Incident: How Social Media has Changed Warfare Coverage - HuffPo
Advertisements [?]
The Wikileaks Incident: How Social Media has Changed Warfare Coverage
Phil Bronstein - Executive Vice President and Editor-at-Large, San Francisco Chronicle
Posted: April 6, 2010 08:27 PM

<snip>

Who do you believe, me or your own eyes? It depends.

I ran back to my hotel room, the smell of blood, fear and rebellion still fresh in my head. Somewhere hovering over me was a deadline for the newspaper and a vague sense that some competitors were also writing their own versions of what had happened throughout that long day and night. History, I was sure, held its breath and waited, relying on our telling of it.



It was 1986, in the Philippines. I plugged in my brick of an Epson portable computer, flipped up the screen with its three-line display and made sure my sofa-sized modem was handy. Photographer Kim Komenich had his set-up for picture transmission that involved a rotating drum with sensors, like an old phonograph, just a lot slower. Phone lines sucked.

We could only know for sure what we had seen out there, which anyone in San Francisco with a quarter would know in about another 18 hours. My notebook and Kim's camera were the instruments of recorded fact.

Today, a non-traditional news web site, WikiLeaks, which has its own mystery and secretiveness, apparently cracked a US government encryption code (so, how good can those codes be?) and released stunning and revealing classified helicopter gunship footage they'd cadged from a source.

Within moments, the world exploded in furious debate over 38 minutes worth of hard-eyed Baghdad gunfire and death back in 2007.

A full pinball meltdown among opinionators everywhere spun out flaming outrage and rampant, self-assured positions on an Apache chopper crew's shooting of a dozen people in the street. From blogs: "Iraq Slaughter..Not An Exception, The Rule." On the other side: "Killed Photographer Was Hanging With Insurgents." And those were the calm ones.

The old, venerable media outlet, Reuters, which had two employees among the dead, could not get squat out of government officials the last three years, despite pressure and a Freedom of Information Act request. So much for the power of MSM. Thank you shadowy world of WikiLeaks -- unless you're one of those who thinks the organization is a national security threat...

<snip>

More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/phil-bronstein/the-wikileaks-incident-ho_b_527788.html

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC