Priest Kiesle tied up two boys and "molested" them. The Pope delayed defrocking him. It's the case with the letter with Ratzie's signature you see all over today and yesterday.
It says Kiesle was arrested in 1978 and plead guilty to lewd conduct for the incident. He was place on probation. The stink is that Ratie delayed things. What I don't get is how is "molesting" a boy you have tied up misdemeanor "lewd conduct"? Did the prosecutor's go easy on him too? Was that prevalent too? Is that a scandal or was the incident really that minor? Something that started out innocent then the priest exposed himself or something. Molestation doesn't really get reduced to lewd conduct very often.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
