You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: Very clearly stated, but.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
bondwooley Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Very clearly stated, but....
... the filibuster wasn't born with the Republic, and evolved through changing Senate rules in the 1800's ...

So are you saying that the Senate rules, including the loophole that became a filibuster, evolved to reflect the ideas of the founding fathers? Having worked in the Senate, I'm skeptical about that! ;)

FYI, not trying to pick an argument ... you seem to know about this and I am honestly interested in the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC