Reply #95: No, you haven't. [View All]

"It's a quote from a court finding supporting a legislative ban on pit bulls."
"which is quoted from the finding of the appeals court in Canada, finding that the legislature's decision to ban pit bulls was well founded."

Nope, don't see where you said it's a a quote from the column in the OP. Still no LINK to the article?

No, no link. Simply repeating "it's the truth!" clap your hands and believe. No link to something showing what you say is "the truth". Nope.

I find this in OP link (notice the link?)
"In announcing the plan to ban the breed, then attorney general Michael Bryant said in 2004 that pit bulls were "inherently dangerous animals" and "ticking time bombs."

But a statistical survey completed by the THS, which opposes breed-specific legislation and euthanizing animals, suggests that the ban on the breed has not reduced the number of dog bites in the province. It said the number of dog bites in the province has not significantly decreased since the ban came into effect. "