49. But the NYT article talks about her relationship with her father
And how that may have played a role in developing her mind.
If that relationship is fair game for understanding a potential justice's influences, why not others? Did the NYT ask Ms. Kagan what is and is not allowable in their profile? It would seem to be a compromise of journalistic ethics if they allowed her to sign off on what could and could not be included.
So we are already reading about the relationships in Ms. Kagan's life.
Except this one area. Private with a capital P.
I really, honestly do not understand the shifting standards.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
