You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Kennedy on the use of foreign law and the sound of crickets coming from Sen Sessions' office [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-10 09:41 PM
Original message
Justice Kennedy on the use of foreign law and the sound of crickets coming from Sen Sessions' office
Advertisements [?]
Senator Sessions said during Justice Sotomayor's confirmation hearing that the use of foreign law by judges is dangerous: “The novel idea that foreign law has a place in the interpretation of American law creates numerous dangers and a number of academics and even federal judges are, I would say, seduced by this idea... Judge Sotomayor clearly shares in that.”

Countless jurists, academics, and Supreme Court Justices have stated the importance of consulting but not relying on foreign law. Most recently Justice Breyer, Professor Goodwin Liu, and now Justice Kennedy explains, I am sure to the dismay and outrage of quite a few Neanderthal Senators.


Answering questions after a speech at the Palm Beach Country Bar Association, Friday, May 14th 2010
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on November 30, 1987
73 Years Old

"If we said that the UN or a foreign country has a certain rule and therefore our Constitution must mean that, that would be wrong, that would be silly. On the other hand, when we're looking at the human consequences, the institutional consequences, the institutional choices, that the law presents, I think it would be quite silly not to consult what other countries have done, what other countries have learned, for better or for ill. Can you imagine someone's whose career is in literature or science or medicine, saying that he or she is not interested in the developments and the discoveries and the failures and successes in a foreign country, why that would be absolutely silly, and the law is no different. But, we're not saying and this is very important, that because a foreign country does it our Constitution means that, it is a way for us to understand the consequences of these principles... Am I not suppose to read Plato, or Aristotle, or more recently Jacque Maritain, Hobbes, Locke... because they are foreign authors?


Sentaor Session is yet to issue a press release denouncing Justice Kennedy for his disloyalty and disdain for America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC