He poses no risk because when you start to actually get beneath the first layer, you find there is nothing there. This is what killed him in the primaries. He didn't lose because he was LDS (it's not like people who said he was their no. one choice in Iowa and NH prior to him losing his lead didn't know his faith). He lost because when you actually get to the substance part of the debate, he failed. He failed miserably because he couldn't defend his past actions and looked totally out of his league.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
