Reply #196: You're mistaken. As early as a month ago Rasmussen indicated difficulty [View All]

for Specter and considerable gain for Sestak.

You have also not seen the internals, unless I'm mistaken. You could accuse me of not finding a cure for leukemia if you want, and you'd be right. But you haven't found one either, or if you have, you're keeping it to yourself.

Internals aren't generally public-access information.

The Pittsburgh Democrats convened for an endorsement but could not reach a consensus of Specter because Sestak's support was too great; they adjourned with no endorsement. Sestak, in fact, had more total votes than Specter and his surge denied Specter the threshold needed to gain the endorsement. Note also that this is on the opposite side of your state from Sestak's home district.