You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: Did you read the first article? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Did you read the first article?
Edited on Mon May-30-11 05:10 AM by Cali_Democrat

- Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday he hopes Baghdad asks U.S. troops to stay beyond their scheduled Dec. 31 departure

- "I hope they figure out a way to ask, and I think that the United States will be willing to say 'yes' when that time comes," Gates said

- Gates said a longer U.S. military presence could help sustain the security and other gains Iraq has made in recent years.

- The Pentagon chief's comments on Iraq were in line with what he said while visiting the country last month.

- In his remarks Tuesday he was more expansive, asserting that a longer U.S. stay would send a reassuring signal

- Behind the scenes, Pentagon officials are trying to sort out how they would manage an extended troop presence

- Gates said the U.S. could provide further assistance to the Iraqi military


Please note the bold text above. The Pentagon is apparently preparing for something that their commander in chief says will never happen and is totally against?

Why is Gates continuing to float the idea of continued US troop presence in Iraq again and again and again over several months? Why has Obama failed to correct him over this time?

So Gates, Obama's secretary of Defense, is just whacked out of his mind? Not only does he not speak for the Obama Administration even though he's an Obama Administration official, but the Secretary of Defense has no real insight into US defense policy?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC