You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: i would guess it has something to do with the 2009 arra, which included some modifications [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. i would guess it has something to do with the 2009 arra, which included some modifications
Edited on Thu May-12-11 05:42 AM by Hannah Bell
in the bush tax cuts.

or else something to do with projections (like cbo's) that project the rich will have some down years next decade due to recession.

though i see no evidence they will.

ah, no, here it is: they're using figures from treasury:

According to figures from the Treasury, extending the Bush income tax cut for the richest 2
percent would cost $678 billion over a decade.

again, projections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC