You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The debt clause in the 14th does not grant a presidential power [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 11:36 AM
Original message
The debt clause in the 14th does not grant a presidential power
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 11:39 AM by JackRiddler
The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution is easy to look up.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment14/

The first clauses guarantee equal rights for all citizens under the law in the aftermath of the Civil War. The first sentence of the fourth clause, which some people now imagine is relevant to the current debt ceiling struggle, only makes a general statement that US debt will not be questioned, but does not confer a power either to the president or to another branch of government.

Section. 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.


In historical context, this isn't actually about United States debt. It's about Confederate debt. It says that the US renounces the rebel states' debts, but prefaces this (in the bolded sentence) with the assurance that no one should worry that this has anything to do with US debt. Again, no specific power to raise the debt ceiling (which is legislated, not constitutional) is either implied or granted to the president or anyone else.

Even if an attempt can be made to invoke the first sentence as implying a unilateral or emergency authority to raise the debt ceiling, lest the credit of the United States "be questioned," the White House (again conceding in advance) has already said they don't think the 14th gives the president that power. So it would be an unprecedented and risky move, probably reckless, given the makeup of the Roberts Court and the now existing videotape of Carney saying the White House doesn't believe the 14th amendment is relevant.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC