You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: It's more silliness [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's more silliness
Congress can't bind Congress except through a rules change. It's also unseemly for a motion that passes with a simple majority to require a vote requiring a supermajority. Rules of order typically chuckle at such ham-fisted attempts to control a committee.

It passed the House; had it passed the Senate and been signed, Obama would have left the language stand because it doesn't affect him. The Congress would have largely ignored the language because, really, it doesn't affect them. Those who insisted on the language would pitch a fit and use it in campaigning; that's their business, such campaigns are local and not state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC