Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Backs Colombia in Venezuela Dispute

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:35 PM
Original message
U.S. Backs Colombia in Venezuela Dispute
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 03:14 PM by Rose Siding
BOGOTA, Colombia -- The United States sided Saturday with Colombia, its strongest ally in Latin America, over a growing rift between Venezuela and Colombia over Bogota's hiring of bounty hunters to capture a Marxist guerrilla in the Venezuelan capital.
...
"We support 100 percent the declarations from (Colombia's) presidential palace," U.S. Ambassador William Wood told reporters, referring to a statement from Uribe in which he defended the capture.

Wood said the FARC was correct when it sent out a statement after Granda's capture, asking Chavez to clarify Venezuela's position on whether FARC guerrillas and members of other leftist groups are permitted in the country. The FARC said Venezuela's government told Granda he could be in the country.

"For the first and probably last time we are in agreement with the FARC, which in its Dec. 30 communique asks the Venezuelan government to define its position," Wood said.

Uribe "is willing to discuss the subject with President Chavez face to face," Uribe spokesman Ricardo Galan told The Associated Press on Saturday. He said Uribe wants the meeting to be "in front of other presidents and in public."

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-colombia-venezuela,0,743287.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. link? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Got it.
sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. interesting piece
Thanks for including it. It's hard to figure out what is going on based on this. Have you read any recent pieces from NACLA that discuss this? My subscription has lapsed. I need to renew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like Uribe wants Colombias's Ass kicked
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 02:56 PM by mitchtv
Colombia's forces would collapse. The ensuing loss of teritory will cost Uribe his position.
All lies Veenezuela does not want guerrillas operating there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop_the_War Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Viva Venezuela!
I support Venezuela. Long live Hugo Chavez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hmm. So much for supporting democratic ideals around the world.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pot...Kettle.
Wouldn't the US taking the claims of FARC at face value be a bit like the US taking the claims of the Hamas at face value?

Is FARC about to be elevated from "terrorist" to "freedom fighter" status, just so the US has an excuse to funnel black-ops funds into Latin America and attempt another coup in Venezuela?

Iran-Contra II, here we come!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. I guess they want to change the subject from the kidnapping,
and violation of sovereignty. Is it possible they didn't expect to get
caught, and this is damage control and butt-covering? Hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC