Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

POWELL'S SON TO RESIGN !! -- TODAY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
doxieone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:20 AM
Original message
POWELL'S SON TO RESIGN !! -- TODAY
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 09:22 AM by doxieone
CNBC

Just mentioned. I think I heard Carlisle....

No link yet.

(EDIT)

Link

http://money.cnn.com/2005/01/21/news/newsmakers/powell_resigning/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. So who is Bush going to pick
that is worse than Powell, to replace him?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. ...desk job in Hell came open, he had to go.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Probably just that moron that says spongebob has a gay agenda--
You just know it will be someone worse than Powell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JMac Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
64. James Dobson n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
31. * and condi's love child candy
it's a shoo in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GoSolar Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
55. LOL!
Good one.

His replacement will be just as bad, or maybe worse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DubyaSux Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
58. Is the racist comment necessary?
You know, I think Powell is as much of an asshat as anybody else, but why the racist slams?

His color has nothing to do with anything. Idiots come in all shapes and sizes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DubyaSux Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. I think I understand...
....racist slurs are fine as long as it supports the democratic platform and used in proper context.

Apparantly, I have a lot of DU societal catching up to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. Yeah, and Jeb Bush has some catching up to do
on who a felon is or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. Condi and Powell are in prominent position ONLY BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE.
That is why their skin color is important. They have NO actual power. The are TOKENS. They are UNCLE TOMS. THE OLD WHITE MEN HAVE ALL OF THE REAL POWER.

It's not a "societal DU" thing--it's a RIGHTWING PROPAGANDA THING and it's obvious to any liberal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #65
81. Come on, guys
this is not relevant to the matter at hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #81
84. and again, someone show us how concerned they were about
the blacks who were kept from voting in 2000 in Florida, and 2004 in Ohio.
Powell and Rice give cover to THEIR racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #65
86. Maybe they were to the guy who hired them...
...but they're WHORES, just like the rest of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steely_Dan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. I agree...However...
What if that poster is African American??? Would you feel differently?

-P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DubyaSux Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. No..
....not at all. Why should I? Powell's color of his skin has nothing to do with anything.

In my opinion, racism has no place here or anywhere. Obviously, I'm the only one here feeling that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Yes, the color of Powell's skin is important.
There are NO blacks in positions of real power in the Bush administration, only phony power. There is NOT ONE black GOP member of Congress and the GOP blacks in the administration and in the judicial branch are TOKENS. They are pure window dressing to make it look like the GOP isn't racist.

GOP blacks take orders from white guys. They could be replaced by stuffed animals. Get it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DubyaSux Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Ok...
....I'm convinced. Racial slurs are good as long as we're the ones slinging them because we are righteous in doing so.

No need to shout me down. You win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. Yep. Nobody listened to Powell when he said they needed more troops
No futher proof needed that the guy is a lawn ornament for these asswipes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SodoffBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
40. Probably somebody in Condi's nuclear family
same as before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
49. Dobson
That would be the ultimate nightmare!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #49
74. I can only hope
Please, please, please put Dobson or Falwell or someone like this in the FCC.

I want them to get so big-headed and oblivious they totally overstep their bounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
94. No one will replace Powell- the FCC is being dismantled.
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 09:36 PM by stlsaxman
Who needs regulations anyways?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good riddance
I just wonder what shill they'll get to replace him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. does murdoch have children?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Yes. Rupert Jr running the Ny Post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. are his children us citizens (yet)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suegeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Does Joe Goebbels have any grandsons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
50. No but Mussolini had a granddaughter
who serves in Berlusconi's cabinet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. I hear Michael Eisner will be looking for work soon!
...with LOTS of campaign dollars to give from his golden parachute!

I could hear it now:

"...who better to regulate the future of our communications than someone who's proven himself to be an innovator and leader in the communications industry already? As he's no longer an employee of Disney, there will be no conflict of interest...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here ya go...
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michael Powell will resign from the agency he has led for four years, according to a newspaper editorial Friday.

Powell, a member of the FCC since November 1998 and the chairman since early 2001, will announce his resignation Friday, according to the Wall Street Journal in an editorial.

FCC spokesmen were not immediately available for comment.


http://money.cnn.com/2005/01/21/news/newsmakers/powell_resigning/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is Michael pissed at Cheney and Rumsfeld also?
Michael's daddy Colin L. Powell announced his resignation yesterday, now today Bappy resigns. What gives? We know that it wasn't over U.S. foreign policy, 'eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. He doesn't want to stay in Washington if Daddy isn't going to be there
to protect him. wahhh wahhhhh -- Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
53. Powell Jr. was given FCC Job to Keep Powell Sr.
in line. The job to Powell Jr. was an insurance policy for GWB. Same for the jobs for Scalia's son, Rehnquist's daughter, etc. Dads don't do things that will hurt their children, so if you want to control the father, you make the child's welfare dependent on you. It's a sort of Mafia technique.

In its primitive form, the child (or the child's wellbeing) is taken hostage. The father has to do the hostage-taker's bidding to ensure the safety of the child. Bully Bush just uses a more sophisticated form of it.

Nepotism should be prohibited for this and other reasons. It's bad enough that so many congressmens' wives and children are lobbyists and taking money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #53
67. Bingo!!
You hit it right on the head.......

It's an old custom in politics and has been used before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #53
82. Clinton nominated Powell jr
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 01:59 PM by medeak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #53
92. Not entirely true.......
Michael Powell was appointed to the FCC by Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thedailyshow Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. YES! hopefully someone better and more fair takes over!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Don't hold your breath
He'll probably appoint Roger Ailes or Rupert Murdoch.

Or some televangelist nutjob to continue the censorship trend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
48. Hey maybe he could take Ralph Reed....
... and just when you thought things could get better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
68. You're quite the optimist
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. They must've gotten a call from Fox.
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. They'll just replace this this turd with another.
Though, I'm glad to see him go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coffeenap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Dobson???n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. They already advanced Condi. Enough Powells, people with skin
different then ours....We can always find a thug that is 100% like us (BFEE speaking here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
41. Not so fast...... they could always go for the Asian "demographic"...
...and appoint the NeoCons' favorite false Messiah, the Rev Sun Myung Moon. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Niccolo_Macchiavelli Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
88. Michelle Malkin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
16. News like this always scares me. Makes me think he's being replaced by
someone even lamer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
18. Good. Course they'll replace him with someone just as bad if not worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inslee08 Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Yeah, I doubt this will change policy
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. True. They're not looking to change policy but to expand it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
21. Armstrong Williams is looking for work.
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 10:00 AM by DemoTex
But the FCC job doesn't pay nearly as much as his last gig with Bu$hco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
24. "Powell's son." Pretty funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
25. will Colin Powell write a tell all book now ?
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 09:39 AM by JI7
i sure wont buy it. i wont buy the book of anyone who supported Bush and only came forward until after the elections like Christie Todd Whitman to criticize him. these people wanted Bush to win so they could make money off of the anti Bush people who they hope will buy their books criticizing Bush and his administration.

i will support people like Paul O'Neill and Richard Clarke who came forward before .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
26. Limbaugh would be a good choice for the position. He could
fill it as a part-time job, pop his pills, and continue to rant over the airwaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
27. yesterday he opens an 'investigation' of Armstrong, today his resigns
anyone think there's more to that than coincidence?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
28. Not to worry...
...they'll replace him with someone just as corprat-media loyal, of not more so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
29. Was it forced by Bushco's to punish his Dad -- or ---
What could be cool is if he resigned to be in solidarity with his Dad who was screwed over by the neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. Yeah
This is a more intelligent statement of the problem.

Powell WAS a good General. He WAS a good diplomat. Then he got used by the Neo-Con movement.

Maybe it was a baby-sitting mission, maybe it was team loyalty, but Powell bowed down to the machine and got chewed up. He lied to the UN over it, and he lost all of his integrity.

In the end, one of our better military and foreign policy minds is now forever tainted with the mark of the beast...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
75. "better military and foreign policy minds" ?!?
No, I've not ever respected Colin Powell as our Secretary of State. I remember him covering up war crimes in Vietnam when he was just a Major. Powell has always been an "Uncle Tom" and was promoted by affirmative action initiatives that his neo-con boss men have always deplored ... well almost as much as they deplore his "necessary" presence to silence dissenters.

Evil = Using *right wing* people of color to forward principles that promote fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
30. Wish they ALL would "Spend more time with their families."
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 09:52 AM by Dr Fate
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
32. WHOO HOO Jeezus TV time!
It's coming, no doubt about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdhunter Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
33. I prefer the devil I know to the devil I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
71. I agree. Given the radical right's recent spongebob
agenda, as well as how bolstered the religious right has been since the election results came in, I'm a little concerned that it will be someone from the ranks of right-wing media critics. It could be very ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
36. I'm not celebrating
Because Bush will just appoint a religious right wing nut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #36
45. Speaking of which, where's Ashcroft?
just, you know, wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #36
83. Gary Bauer
He has enough stature!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerryman814 Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
37. Can anyone say WooHoo? .. Just that...
I am scared to see who they are going to replace him with. It's a wonder how some of these important positions aren't elected officials. Michael Powell changed the landscape of American media in his tenure and he wasn't even wanted... Go figure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
38. See ya Fat Albert!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drscm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
39. Subheading: Powell sent over the edge by Sponge Bob's butt. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
42. So who else has the qualifications...
Or shall I say "lack of qualifications" to guarantee them the job?

Any hints from Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell that anyone's heard? :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
77. Perhaps Ted Turner might be one that could be considered...
by the Bushies. Not sure whether he would have a chance at getting a nomination from Bushco, but he is from the corporate world, and he has gotten out of AOL/TimeWarner/CNN conglomerate.

In a perfect world he wouldn't be my first choice, but he might have the resume that Bush could swallow to give an "olive branch" to us progressives. I think he'd use a lot more sense in that position than many others I think Bush might nominate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
43. Could this have anything to do for the pay for PR deal
with Armstrong Williams? or Is he just getting out so he can make real money on some conservative talk "news" show ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. It could be he had knowledge of the payola to the ConRag
network talking heads and is getting out as part of the deal. A resignation as abrupt as this has something other than "family" involved. It's the * cover your ass mantra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawladyprof Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
46. Talk about nepotism made blatantly obvious
If Michael was competent and doing an acceptable job why is he resigning now? His father is leaving and he only held his position while his dad was SOS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
47. Retiring to join a traveling minstrel show
They'll be brightening spirits in Iraq with their USO tour.

What a horrible man; good riddance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
51. Bye, jerk! What monster will they unearh to replace him? The owner of
Faux? (I hope I'm kidding)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Even worse...the chairman/president/head idiot of
The PTC!

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
54. but this is still a good thing
I won't miss him and neither with Janet Jackson's nipple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marzipanni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
56. The Washington, D.C. Museum of Forbidden Words and Images
Hear Howard Stern! See Janet Jackson's nipple! Spongebob Squarepants! Spirit of Justice Statue(undraped(!) Family Guy's rear end! Nicolette Sheridan's back! Collection is constantly added to, so return for a visit frequently!

Dear Public, We are sorry to inform you that this is a Private Museum. Admission restricted to Republican, Fundamentalist, White (or White Wannabe) Men who secretly get off on all this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
57. That can ONLY mean ONE THING
His replacement will be a MORE morally bereft, capricious, easily malleable, "Loyal to THE PARTY and The Emperor, NOT the Nation" type of person.

I wonder if Albert Speer is available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #57
72. well, I kind of wonder if this is in solidarity with Daddy.
I like to think some of the medium-evil types are jumping ship so as to salvage their reps amound moderate convervs before the extreme evil types come in and saturate the whole capitol with oozing green goo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #57
87. how about "Holier than a falafel" Bill O'Leilly!

www.cafepress.com/showtheworld
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
73. Be afraid. His replacement is bound to be worse
With the McChristians launching their spongebob attack this week, with all the flack over morality in programming over the last year, from Janet Jackson to Desperate Housewives, and with the neo-pharisees all excited and empowered over their alleged role as the deciding factor in the election, I have a feeling the new chief will be Brett Bozell, or at least somebody who comes from the networks of right-wing media/culture critics: bozell, donald wildmon, shlaffly, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. True, plus the consistent purge
of Powell power from the top. Wait until Bush gets hold of the SCOTUS and the Fed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
76. It's really quite sad
With this administration the minute you think you have good news you then realize it may not be good news at all. It could be wonderful news that little boy powell is quitting, but then you realize his replacement will probably be worse. Am i too cynical?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frangible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
78. He was too moderate like his father
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 01:36 PM by Frangible
Can't have any stinking moderates getting in the way of the glory of das reich.

I bet his replacement is a Christian fundamentalist neoconservative who enjoys torturing animals in his spare time, likes long walks along the beach, and frequent trips to Gitmo.

Other possiblities include Rupert Murdoch and the CEO of Clear Channel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #78
93. "Moderate" my ass!
This man has done so much damage..he is leaving because NOW it is payback time from all the broadcasters whom benefited under Powell.

My letter to the FCC written almost 2 years ago.

quote....
On June 2nd Michael Powell and the FCC plan on rewriting history. The result of this ruling is well known… even to me. Consolidation will bring one voice, one corporate philosophy and immeasurable corporate influence over vital issues and elections. The independent TV station and newspaper will be gone forever, and with it the entrepreneurial spirit that built America. We have now seen the 1996 radio ownership ruling has now given one company over 1200 radio stations…and ONE voice. When I put a "search" into Goggle it comes back with the exact same article from dozens of TV and newspapers…So much for diversity.
In the last two years the United States of America, a Democratic Republic was turned upside down into a "Banana Republic". This administration does not care about education, the future of our children or a well informed populous and are planning on changing the political system in this country. I'm curious, why did we invade Iraq? We wanted to give them free elections. This starts with a free press, diverse opinions and an open forum to share ideas.
The public airwaves were licensed to the broadcast media in the "public interest". No one is saying that the media should not make a profit, but not at the expense of the 1st Amendment. Has anyone in DC read the Constitution? The FCC represents the "people" NOT major corporations who spend 100's of millions lobbying to influence favorable legislation.
When one issue, brings together forces from across the political spectrum; one would expect a re-evaluation of the decision. Sadly I hear nothing from the FCC or the John McCain's Commerce Committee in the Senate. Whether you are sent to DC through election or appointment, you have an ethical, moral and professional obligation to do your job of representing the people, and make your voice heard. The silence is deafening.
I have to ask my self why? Who gains? The answer is obvious. We know how the media will gain through downsizing of staff and overhead. My outrage is directed squarely at Michael Powell. His unwillingness to hold public debate, listen to opposing views only confirms his own personal/professional agenda. This decision is self-serving and lays the groundwork for future employment in the private sector after he leaves government. As a lawyer, with a specialty in anti-trust matters, mergers and government regulation in the telecommunication industry his private sector employment is in demand. After this ruling all the major broadcast companies will be standing in line to show their appreciation.
When the sun goes down on June 2nd I will light a memorial candle for the 1st Amendment and the future of this great country, and shed a few tears…the ramifications of this ruling will not be understood for years.

end quote........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
80. Perhaps they'll take Mark Hyman of the Sinclair Group...
That way, they can guarantee that the FCC won't follow up on charges against the Sinclair Group...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
85. that's smart of micheal powell. he's been talked to by daddy and
they know what they were dealing with and they seem to know what is around the corner. it is an ominous foreboding to me. what fundie lunatic will they replace him? ....sigh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
89. It is difficult to think the timing isn't significant
Obviously, his lying father leaving the State Department is probably connected with the son leaving the FCC. Beyond that, it is hard to say. It depends whether he is really leaving of his own free will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
90. What, did they find someone who'd kiss MORE corporate ass?
They must have found a candidate who's even more fervently a supporter of media consolidation. Or more scared of nipples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
91. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
95. So what - they're just gonna replace him with an even worse SOB.
I don't see anything worth "celebrating" in this.

I just can't imagine how much worse it will be - but of this I am positive: It will be much worse than we could ever have dreamed of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
96. Off to make money off of the damage he did, i bet.
but will he win those cases he will soon file? of course not, that's not how the game is played...

bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC