Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld 'surprised' by Saddam loyalists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:52 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld 'surprised' by Saddam loyalists
SIMI VALLEY, Calif. (AP) — Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Friday he was surprised by the effectiveness of Saddam Hussein's loyalists to sustain the Iraq conflict long after the end of major combat operations. He called the continuing fighting serious but described it as low intensity.

Fear instilled in the Iraqi people by the ousted leader's former paramilitary force is contributing to the situation, he told an audience of more than 500 at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.

"I suppose on reflection the thing that probably surprised me the most is the ability that the so-called Fedayeen Saddam people had to terrorize and frighten the rest of the Iraqi people and cause them to not come over to the other side," Rumsfeld said in answer to a question from the audience.

Two U.S. soldiers were killed in an ambush in Iraq on Friday, bringing to 94 the number of American soldiers killed by hostile fire in Iraq since President Bush declared an end to major combat on May 1.

Rumsfeld said coalition forces made 1,700 patrols daily in Iraq and only a tenth of 1% involved any kind of armed conflict. "It is a very low-intensity situation, percentage-wise, nonetheless people are getting killed," Rumsfeld said.

(more)

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-10-10-rumsfeld-iraq_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Coventina 'surprised' by Rummy's idiocy
ok, well, maybe not THAT surprised.

WHAT THE FUCK ARE THESE FUCKHEADS DOING??????
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THEM?????
A FIFTH GRADER COULD RUN OUR FOREIGN POLICY BETTER THAN THESE BOOBS!

</skittles>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. so-called. low-intensity. what a complete failure of a man.
he's going to roll. he won't last out the chimp's term
before he takes the fall. he hasn't got a damned clue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am shocked. Shocked I tell you
Edited on Fri Oct-10-03 10:06 PM by NNN0LHI
I never even considered the idea that the Iraqi people might want us to actually leave some day? The thought never occurred to me. Cross my heart and hope to die.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's low intensity all right


especially as Rummy knows that his priveliged, lilly-white ass isn't in any danger of being in the line of fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, it's low intensity. It only results in death.
I have heard the expression "Rum Dumb" but only recently has it made sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morebunk Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Surprised? We probably account for the increase in Saddam loyalists.
Six months with US troops occupying your country and Saddam look like a holy man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. s?r-pr?z?
To cause to feel wonder, astonishment, or amazement, as at something unanticipated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Low intensity"?? Explain that to the parents of dead U.S. soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. "Low Intensity Conflict" is military jargon
for guerrilla warfare. The 1991 war against Iraq was called "Mid Intensity Conflict".

fwiw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Send some GOP children soldiers out there and you'll see a withdrawl
before sunset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'm "suprised" that Rumsfeld is in Simi Valley
Rumsfeld loves these cute little understatements. "Things are untidy" or "Unfortunate" or "The unknown unknowns". I'm not impressed by this smugness, it reminds me of the sick and dangerous mind of Hannibal Lechter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. Any of those Idiots in ur WH read History ??

Remember Vietnam ??


'nuff said

(sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Rumsfeld's childlike thinking may be the beginning of Altzheimers....
gin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. his remarks were made at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
:evilgrin:

:spank:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. Perhaps Weasel Ass should have listened to the pre-war CIA intel.

Reports show CIA warned administration of postwar perils


In February, the CIA gave a formal briefing to the National Security Council, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick Cheney and President Bush himself: "A quick military victory in Iraq will likely be followed by armed resistance from remnants of the Ba'ath Party and Fedayeen Saddam irregulars."

. . .

According to U.S. intelligence officials who compiled or contributed to the reports, and provided excerpts to the Globe, on multiple occasions in the months before the war the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency warned that fighting probably would continue after the formal war. The assessments went so far as to suggest that guerrilla tactics could frustrate reconstruction efforts.
http://charleston.net/stories/081003/ter_10cia.shtml

I am shocked and awed that Rumsfeld and Bush are too fucking stupid to consider pre-war intelligence reports before planning the invasion and occupation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. So much for the "we will be liberators" that Cheney harped on
It infuriates me that Rumsfeld refuses to use the term guerilla war for what is going on in Iraq. I am also livid that he is blaming Saddams loyalists as the reason the rest of the Iraqi's "wont come to the other side". Did he ever stop to think that they are in worse shape than ever? Spotty electricity, water shortage, aid shortage, insufficient medical facilities, just to name a few! Maybe they don't want to come to the other side OUT OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL! But of course, it is just more of the same, it isn't our fault. Somebody else made the situation what it is.

I will be very happy when that icky creep is out of a job. How unfortunate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. NEEDED A KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertrand Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. Just a thought
perhaps by saying this he is trying to dissuade people from the thought of it being a popular revolt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. revolt? - FECKADEE - they got INVADED by peeps 8,000 miles away !


THEY are OCCUPIED

If they were fighting Saddam


- THAT would be a revolt


Just My Humble Canuk Opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertrand Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. No
a revolt is an attempt to overthrow existing authority, which is consistent with how i used the word in my previous post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. So does this mean that Iraq
really wasn't a threat? How can you be surprised that they would continue to be a problem, when you were convinced that they were a serious and imminent threat to the US and that is why we had to invade them? Either Iraq was a threat or it wasn't. Pick one Rummie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saudade Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
21. Suprised?
I can't imagine why anyone -- espcially an American who values freedom and self-determination -- would be surprised that people would resist the military occupation of their country by a foreign power.

Is Rumsfeld stupid?

Or, could it be that Rumsfeld isn't really "surprised" at all, but, for whatever reason, is telling yet another fucking LIE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saudade Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. Shi'ites
If the nazi Rumsfeld is "surprised" now by the "Saddam loyalists," imagine how "shocked" he'll be when the Shi'ite majority decides that they don't have to worry about the Ba'ath Party any more and decide to get rid of the "Anglo-American Coalition."

That's coming soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I don't really believe it's just "Saddam Loyalists"
If the USA ever invaded Canada

- even the peeps that HATED our Government for one reason or another

- would surely fight an OCCUPIER

- Forever


One thing that alot of USA peeps furget

Iraq was NOT at war with ANYONE

and the USA basically did over $50 Billion of damage to their infrastructure

Nevermind the decades of disease, death and suffering that will result from the use of Depleted Uranium

And the destroyed Crop fields

And the 8,000 dead who have living relatives

And the many more relatives with severely injured and maimed

and -- and -- and

Iraqis HATE the USA now

-they got let down in '91 - - --

'nuff said

Not enuf room here to describe all the damage and hate ur WH has created

Sad, But TRUE

(sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sushi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
23. I think he will be
announcing he wants to "spend more time with the family" soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Will his family want him back?
Is "reckless stupidity" grounds for divorce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Maybe not, but
surely being Skeletor's double is! (Take a good look!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kick!
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. In other news, traitor Rumsfeld's head found to contain three brain cells.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2cents Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. And I'm sure he's completely bewildered...
...when he has a regular stool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC