Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems to Question Roberts on Torture Memo (Leahy to bring up "Bybee memo")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 05:44 PM
Original message
Dems to Question Roberts on Torture Memo (Leahy to bring up "Bybee memo")
Edited on Mon Aug-29-05 05:49 PM by truthpusher
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1078228&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

Dems to Question Roberts on Torture Memo
------------------
Democrat Patrick Leahy Says Roberts to Be Questioned on Torture Memo, Presidential Power
------------------
By JESSE J. HOLLAND Associated Press Writer
The Associated Press
------------------
Aug. 29, 2005 - Democrats plan to question Supreme Court nominee John Roberts about a disavowed Justice Department memo that critics say led to torture in foreign prisons, top Senate Judiciary Democrat Patrick Leahy of Vermont said Monday.

Leahy said he gave Roberts a copy of the so-called "Bybee memo" during a meeting Monday in the Senate's Russell office building. It was the second meeting between the two men since July, when President Bush nominated Roberts to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

Then-Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee argued in a Jan. 22, 2002, memo that the president has the power to issue orders that violate the Geneva Conventions as well as international and U.S. laws prohibiting torture.

"It will be raised, partly on the question of to what area if any can a president be considered above the law," Leahy told reporters.

(snip)



complete story: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1078228&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. that's good news and worth a greatest--Dems finally asking
the obvious question that will make the right squirm.

Hillbilly Hitler art:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if this means he can be prosecuted for torture also. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The article left me with the impression that the
"Bybee memo" was given to Roberts for him to be able to comment on.

It's unclear to me that he's had any further connection with it other than recently coming into possession of a copy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. No hearings without Roberts' full record
Until the White House, which nominated Roberts for this lifetime appointment, produces a full copy of Roberts' record as a government lawyer, Senate Democrats should block any attempt to hold a committee hearing on Roberts' qualifications. Then they should block any attempt to issue a committee report without inclusion of their minority report recommending against confirming Roberts. Then they should block any attempt to bring the Roberts nomination to a vote.

It'll take some party discipline, but would you hire someone for a lifetime job without looking very carefully at his entire record? Of course not. And the Senate has a constitutional obligation to check into Roberts' career before considering a vote on his nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. You're dreaming.
Some of our bulldogs like Kennedy and Leahy will try to keep things honest, but in the end Roberts will get 70+ votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Perhaps
But John Bolton was a shoe-in for UN Ambassador just a few days before Democrats started insisting on reviewing his full record. Bush was reduced to giving him a recess appointment, and Bolton has shown he was every bit as incompetent as his critics said he would be.

With that kind of recent track record, coupled with Bush's plummeting approval ratings, I think there might be a few Democrats willing to hold the administration's feet to the fire on getting Mr. Roberts' full record before the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. That Jay ByBee gets around
The Italian bank BNL was one of BCCI's main tentacles. BNL's Atlanta branch was the primary funnel used by the first Bush Administration to send millions of secret dollars to Saddam for arms purchases, including deadly chemicals and other WMD materials supplied by the Chilean arms dealer Cardoen and various politically-connected operators in the United States like, weapons merchant Matrix Churchill. (As always with the Busha Nostra, geopolitics--in this case, helping Saddam wage aggressive war against Iran--and crony profits go hand in hand. Once the war was over and Iran was left a shattered hulk, with millions dead and displaced, the useful idiot Saddam was expendable, swiftly morphing from good buddy into budding Hitler.)

As soon as the BNL case broke, President Bush I moved to throttle the investigation. He appointed lawyers from both Cardoen and Matrix to top Justice Department posts--where they supervised the officials investigating their old companies. Meanwhile, White House aides applied heavy pressure on other prosecutors to restrict the range of the probe--especially the fact that Bush cabinet officials Brent Scowcroft and Lawrence Eagleburger had served as consultants for BNL during their pre-White House days as spear-carriers for yet another secretive international front that profits from war, weapons, etc., etc.: Kissinger Associates.

Which brings us to the judicial appointment. One of the White House aides who unlawfully intervened in the BNL prosecution was a certain factotum named Jay S. ByBee. Last week, said factotum was nominated by the current warmer of the Oval Office seat, George W. Bush, to a place on the federal appeals court--a lifetime sinecure of perks and power. Well done, thou good and faithful servant!

And the commodities connection? President Pretzel's relentless hissy-fit for war on Iraq has of course goosed the price of gold enormously--and that's set Bush Family coffers a-clinking. How so? In the waning days of his failed presidency, Bush I invoked an obscure 1872 statute to give a Canadian firm, Barrick Corporation, the right to mine $10 billion in gold from U.S. public lands. (U.S. taxpayers got a whopping $10,000 fee in return.) Bush then joined Barrick as a highly-paid "international consultant," brokering deals with various dictators of his close acquaintance. Barrick reciprocated with big bucks for Junior's presidential run. And in another quid for the old pro quo, last year Junior dutifully approved Barrick's controversial acquisition of a major rival. (Barrick is also one of the biggest polluters in America, by the way.)

more
http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd02152003.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. amazing, the BFEE truly knows no bounds n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. What hasn't he been involved in? Surely, he's been in on the most
vile doings of this regime for a couple of decades

It may be easier to see a list of the most horrible things the Republicans have tried and check off the ones he has facilitated.

It is obvious he would rule to protect himself and that would involve case after case that could come out after this regime is kicked out.

This is a disgusting nominee.

This is a disaster of a nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC