Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: FBI Plants Sham (Democratic) Candidate in W.Va. Race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 07:54 PM
Original message
AP: FBI Plants Sham (Democratic) Candidate in W.Va. Race
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=157&sid=134990

By LAWRENCE MESSINA
Associated Press Writer

CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) - Thomas Esposito's campaign for the Legislature seemed to be following the usual pattern. The longtime Democratic mayor issued press releases, raised money and bought newspaper ads. Signs bearing his name popped up in yards around rural Logan County.

But less than a month before the May 2004 primary election, Esposito dropped out, saying he had to withdraw because of his ailing mother-in-law.

The real reason surfaced only later: The FBI had planted Esposito among the field of candidates to help find evidence of vote-buying in southern West Virginia.

... The chief judge of West Virginia's southern federal court district condoned the tactic Thursday in an election fraud case against Perry French Harvey Jr., the man who allegedly accepted the $2,000.

more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not a good idea.
I would be really angry if I lived in West Virginia and had supported Esposito, only to find he's a decoy. Aren't there better ways to get to the core of the problem than by duping the voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Duping the voters.
Makes you wonder how often the federal government dupes the voters, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. This should be considered election tampering.
WTF where they thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Jeez, it sure seems like that to me too. Can they do this kind of thing
legally? It seems very strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. They'd have better luck fronting a Repub candidate.
Everybody knows they have the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Damn right.
The nazi party is where the vote fraud is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. not necessarily

Neither party has had a monopoly on corruption historically.

It would be nice if we didn't think being a member of a party meant never criticizing it or holding it accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. Then why no sham candidates for BOTH parties?
Make no mistake--sham candidates is a CRAP move.
But I'm curious as to why there was only a sham Democrat candidate, what with "vote-buying has long been suspected in the region", and all. You'd think they'd be after that corruption on all fronts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Undermining the electoral system
and that's OK?

I'm stunned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. So now the Repugs can get the idea of placing fake candidates in the dem
Edited on Fri Dec-02-05 09:12 PM by superconnected
position, and having them drop out right before the election when nobody else can get their name on the ballot, so they'll win.

They are bad enough to do it.

Thanks for the idea FBI. And why are you guys planting people in elections for anyway. It sounds like a movie for a cia plot in south america...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I came up with that idea MONTHS ago to beat Santorum. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. I think they've already done that...
And they're in the Senate now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. all good points, unfortunately. : - ( n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. This strikes me as very serious.
I don't find anything cute about FBI manipulation of elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Same here
And I'm shocked, shocked!, that the media aren't all over this. Fake candidates in a real election ought to be a big thing -- and if they're there thanks to the FBI, that should be even bigger. Only a minor race in West Virginia? So what.

Then again, as I ponder it, no, I guess I'm not really shocked at anything anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. I agree. what the heck!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. How About Lieberman? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Planted by space aliens? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I hate to say this, but who in current crop of '08 candidates fits this?
Who all is running isn't a fixed tally just yet, but you gotta wonder who among the hopefuls is there just for the ride and won't put up a real fight against Jeb or the recently co-opted McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JusticeForAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. This is bulldung
Edited on Sat Dec-03-05 04:28 AM by JusticeForAll
Someone in the FBI should be locked away for election fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. not surprised they do it --
i am surprised to see it in print.

that's where i tnink the interesting thing is.

that's another one of those moments when the citizenry -- upon reading that -- ought to show up with pitchforks and torches at frankenstein's castle isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. Recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'm sure Glad the FBI is pertecting Amerika
</sarcasm> the spelling is intentional
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. FBI plants sham candidate in W.Va. race
Published Saturday
December 3, 2005

FBI plants sham candidate in W.Va. race


CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) - Thomas Esposito's campaign for the Legislature seemed to be following the usual pattern. The longtime Democratic mayor issued press releases, raised money and bought newspaper ads. Signs bearing his name popped up in yards around rural Logan County.

But less than a month before the May 2004 primary election, Esposito dropped out, saying he had to withdraw because of his ailing mother-in-law.

The real reason surfaced only later: The FBI had planted Esposito among the field of candidates to help find evidence of vote-buying in southern West Virginia.

Federal prosecutors say the gambit worked.

They allege Esposito gave $2,000 in government-supplied money to a resident who had offered to bribe voters on his behalf.

They also credit the undercover sting operation for last year's guilty pleas by the sheriff of Logan County and the police chief in the coal-mining city of Logan, who both admitted to election violations.

The chief judge of West Virginia's southern federal court district condoned the tactic Thursday in an election fraud case against Perry French Harvey Jr., the man who allegedly accepted the $2,000.

Judge David Faber rejected arguments from Harvey's lawyer that the government had acted improperly by putting up a sham candidate.

Esposito, 54, began cooperating with investigators in July 2003, when he agreed to plead guilty to a federal corruption charge. Esposito, an attorney, had failed to notify authorities of criminal activities involving a former county magistrate.

Esposito entered the state House race in January 2004, after losing his bid for a fifth term as Logan mayor. He faces up to three years in prison for the corruption charge and a $250,000 fine at his sentencing Jan. 10. His lawyer, John Carrico, did not respond to messages seeking comment Friday.

Investigators believed that "if Esposito were to become a candidate for elective office, a virtual treasure trove of evidence could result," Assistant U.S. Attorney R. Booth Goodwin II said in a federal court filing last month. "The undercover investigation has yielded important results."

Because Esposito had not dropped out until mid-April 2004, his name remained on the May primary ballot. He received 2,175 votes, coming in last among 10 candidates.

Harvey's lawyer, Greg Campbell, urged the judge to dismiss the vote-buying count against Harvey, 55, who faces trial Dec. 14.

"I can't understand why it's all right to corrupt an election when you're investigating corruption in elections," Campbell said Friday.

But in his ruling, Faber noted that even Campbell had conceded that corruption has been endemic to West Virginia politics.

"It has been nearly impossible to prosecute corruption in Logan County because persons with knowledge of it are reluctant to testify against others in their community," Faber wrote. "Putting Esposito forward as a candidate may have been the only possible means to clean up the political process in Logan County."

The federal election fraud probe has lead to charges against 16 residents of Logan and neighboring Lincoln counties. The Lincoln County assessor and circuit clerk are among those charged with bribing voters in elections dating to 1990.

As Faber observed, vote-buying has long been suspected in the region. Even John F. Kennedy's 1960 campaign allegedly supplied cash to Logan County's political bosses to help him win the West Virginia primary.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Hi Omaha Steve
Edited on Sat Dec-03-05 05:01 PM by flamingyouth
Per DU LBN guidelines, can you please edit your post to no more than four paragraphs and provide a link to the story? Thanks. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. will do, here is what happened
The page the AP story came from rotates the stories out of the link after 6 hours. Had a I posted the link, after that the story could have been about anything. I didn't see this story on any other source at the time. I also checked the entire first page of breaking news and the last ten posts for this story so as not to post a dupe. It had to have been on the second page at that time. Sorry to all. To those that I write in private, my surgery this morning had no complications. Enjoy your weekend all.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. Were there any other Democrats in the race?
Or did they not run because this other guy did?

Any way you slice it, it's election fraud... pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. Didn't they care about Ohio in '04?
Nah. Just wasn't big enough for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. Wrong!!!!!!!
This should bring criminal charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC