Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Report Calls for Huge Efforts on Great Lakes (but who will pay?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:20 AM
Original message
NYT: Report Calls for Huge Efforts on Great Lakes (but who will pay?)
Report Calls for Huge Efforts on Great Lakes
By FELICITY BARRINGER
Published: December 13, 2005


WASHINGTON, Dec. 12 - Cleaning up the Great Lakes will involve heavy investments in wastewater treatment facilities, wetlands restoration and barriers against invasive fish, a coalition of government officials, teamed with businesses and American Indian tribal groups, announced in a report made public Monday.

But on the subject of paying for the work, which the task force estimated would cost $20 billion over 15 years, the partners in the effort delicately diverged.

At a news conference in Chicago on Monday, Stephen L. Johnson, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and a leader of the task force, said the Bush administration wanted "to deliver more efficient and effective federal support, by streamlining the process and better coordinating the more than 140 federal programs that protect the Great Lakes."

The mayors and governors on the task force sent a letter to President Bush calling for $300 million in new spending on these issues next year, but Mr. Johnson limited himself largely to generalizations about the availability of unspecified amounts of money in existing programs. He made one specific financial commitment, pledging to spend $25 million to clean up contaminated sediments in the Ashtabula River in Ohio, which flows into Lake Erie.

In their letter, signed by Mayor Richard M. Daley of Chicago and Govs. Bob Taft of Ohio and James E. Doyle of Wisconsin, the state and local officials said, "We share the goal of accomplishing greater results with existing resources. We also share the overwhelming view of our collaboration partners that federal resources must be increased" in the federal budget for the 2007 fiscal year....


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/13/politics/13lakes.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Only the start of the needed water projects. . .
but the money's being pissed away in the desert of the Fertile Crescent and even they don't have clean water. . .

as a planet, time is running out . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We can't afford a war.
We're bankrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shugah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great Lakes overhaul plan approved
Great Lakes overhaul plan approved

December 13, 2005
BY GARY WISBY Environment Reporter

Although he pledged no funding for a new Great Lakes restoration plan, President Bush's environment chief and regional leaders -- one of them, Mayor Daley, insisting "This is not a publicity stunt" -- signed off on the $20 billion blueprint Monday in celebratory fashion.

Even environmental groups, which have been bashing Bush for his lack of financial support to protect and clean up the lakes, put an optimistic face on the event.

All agreed that getting federal, state, local and American Indian tribal leaders, in addition to advocacy groups, to approve a plan in just one year was a signal achievement.

And all agreed that the real work -- finding money to implement the 15-year agreement -- is just beginning.

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-lakes13.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "This is not a publicity stunt"
-No, it's an attempt to get back "Middle America" in time for time for mid-term elections.

Since when have they EVER cared about environmental policy during this administration. In fact over three decades of environmental policies have been REPEALED during the * mis-administration, and they attempt to tout their environmental responsibilities all of a sudden.

This is EXACTLY a publicity stunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shugah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. yeah
"we're going to clean up the great lakes... ... as soon as we can find the money to do it!"

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC