Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox poll shows Alito support Alito just 35%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 01:17 PM
Original message
Fox poll shows Alito support Alito just 35%

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Fox_poll_shows_Alito_support_Alito_1219.html

Fox poll shows Alito support Alito just 35%
RAW STORY


A poll conducted by Fox News December 13 - 14 shows dwindling support for Bush SCOTUS nominee Samuel Alito. Overall support for Alito has dropped from 46% November 8 - 9 to just 35% among registered voters. This is significantly lower than the 51% support enjoyed by confirmed Bush nominee John Roberts.

The drop in support is across with board, with just 57% of Republicans (down from 75%), 28% of Independents (down from 39%), and a mere 17% of Democrats (down from 26%) reporting that they would vote to confirm Alito, if given the opportunity.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a fine time to have a discussion on constitutional law, eh, Bush?
Wonder if Alito is going to go for this inherent authority crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "Inherent authority" = "divine right of Presidents" under a new name
Of all people, J. Edgar Hoover stopped Nixon in his tracks when he wanted to wiretap leaders of the antiwar movement in 1970. Unfortunately, there are no such curbs on Shrub's usurpation of powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. An elected dictator. And the thing about elected dictators
the elections start to look a little shaky too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's as bad as Bork
Bork him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Bork was a mess and a half and this guy is twice the mess
as Bork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. bork was a brilliant constitutional scholar with a chip on his shoulder
he still is brilliant, but I disagree with his whole premise about our country and our constitution. But it is always enlightening to hear him talk. That, plus the fact that I did not care much for him personally. I have to admit he is one very smart man. at times, his own brilliance blinded him from reality.

Alito is 1/2 as smart, but 2x as dangerous, because he is a soldier, an activist without a soul, a person taking orders about the PNAC take-over the entire nation.
would he support Bush's uncosntitutional and illegal orders re: spying on citizens? Hell, yes, and he would smile while doing it. And, his own ideals blind him from reality far more than Bork.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. the numbers in the different demographics

are essentially identical to those of support for Bush. So Alito is totally identified with Bush's interests and politics (i.e. lying and faux moderacy and simple lack of any guiding principle except ego) in voters' minds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. then he is DOA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. just 57% of Republicans
Wow. Amazing that a SCOTUS nominee would get so much attention as to ride W's coattails down into the gutter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thom Little Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Unless he says something incredibly stupid at his hearing, he's in.
It sux but it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hyernel Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Republicans don't really want to reverse Roe...
...they just want to use it as a devisive wedge issue to work up the dander of jeesus freaks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. With numbers these poor, there has to be a way to stop his confirmation.
What can be done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, we know that whole "up-or-down vote" meme is a sham
After the Harriet Miers debacle, it's clear that the "up-or-down vote" argument is pretty specious coming from the same people who torpedoed the last nomination. Bide a little time, get a few choice comments into the record at his Judiciary Committee hearing, and Alito might torpedo himself. This keeps up, and Stupidhead might have to {gasp!} nominate a non-ideologue, just to get this whole thing behind him. We know that he doesn't have the longest attention span in the world, and if somebody tells him he has to nominate ANOTHER person for the Supreme Court, he'll run crying out of the room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. The commercials
I complained to the History Channel about them running confirm Alito ads. Turned out they were regional ads through my cable provider. I called them about it. They stopped running on the 15th.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. 35%?? Heck, that's a "mandate" in *'s world. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC