Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Probes 10 Renditions of Terror Suspects

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:30 PM
Original message
CIA Probes 10 Renditions of Terror Suspects

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/27/AR2005122700584.html

CIA Probes 10 Renditions of Terror Suspects

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- The CIA's independent watchdog is investigating fewer than 10 cases where terror suspects may have been mistakenly swept away to foreign countries by the spy agency, a figure lower than published reports but enough to raise some concerns.

After the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, President Bush gave the CIA authority to conduct the now-controversial operations, called "renditions," and permitted the agency to act without case-by-case approval from the White House or other administration offices.


The highly classified practice involves grabbing terror suspects off the street of one country and flying them to their home country or another where they are wanted for a crime or questioning.

Some 100 to 150 people have been snatched up since 9/11. Government officials say the action is reserved for those considered by the CIA to be the most serious terror suspects.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. So the CIA is investigating themselves?
I'm sure they'll do a 'heck of a job'. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. does the word "whitewash" ring a bell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. This article is hilarious
"The CIA's independent watchdog..."

WTF??? How can it be independent, OR a watchdog, if it's part of the organization it's supposed to be investigating?

"...fewer than 10 cases..." See, America? It's just a FEW cases, not many, nothing to get all worked up about.

"...terror suspects may have been mistakenly swept away..." Nothing intentional, really. Just an oversight, you know? They obviously never meant to put people on unmarked planes with bags over their heads and fly them to countries were there are secret facilities where they are waterboarded, really.

"After the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001..." WHEN EVERYTHING CHANGED. We were ATTACKED. By TERRORISTS. On SEPTEMBER 11. That's SEPTEMBER 11.

"...reserved for those considered by the CIA to be the most serious terror suspects." See, America? They only rendered and tortured the evildoers, not decent white Americans. So chill.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't ya just love the word "mistakenly" being used in this article!
"may have been mistakenly swept away to foreign countries"

MISTAKENLY???? How does one mistakenly ship people to other countries for torture? The pilot is blind, deaf and dumb and can't figure out a map? They mistake Syria for Guantanamo or the United States or ????

Geez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That jumped out at me, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
larryepke Donating Member (524 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. As well as the words...
"may have been" and the use of passive voice, as if no one did anything they shouldn't have.

An English 101 professor (or grad student aide) would flunk that writing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. At what point does a government so often and so egregiously violate its
Constitution as to no longer be legitimate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think this is what is meant by policing your own
actions.

You police your own actions BEFORE the fact - not afterwards. Before means you stop yourself from doing something criminal/corrupt - but afterwards, it's up to someone else to investigate you.(since you've shown you can't police yourself)


What a government we have - where the corrupt get to investigate themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC