Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Plans to Modernize Nuclear Arsenal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:58 PM
Original message
U.S. Plans to Modernize Nuclear Arsenal
U.S. Plans to Modernize Nuclear Arsenal

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 4, 2006; Page A02

The Bush administration is developing plans to design and deploy refurbished or replacement warheads for the nuclear stockpile, and by 2030 to modernize the production complex so that, if required, it could produce new generations of weapons with different or modified capabilities.

Referring to goals established two years ago, Ambassador Linton F. Brooks, administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), told the House Armed Services subcommittee on strategic forces Wednesday that "we will revitalize our weapons design community to meet the challenge of being able to adapt an existing weapon within 18 months, and design, develop and begin production of a new design within three to four years of a decision to enter engineering development."

A study by NNSA for restructuring the aging weapons complex, which includes dealing with facilities that dismantle retired weapons, should be sent to Congress this spring, Brooks said. Although there is some updating and modernizing of the present complex, "full infrastructure changes . . . will take a couple of decades," Brooks said.

The first step in the long-range plan is focused around the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) program that was approved last year. That program contemplates designing new components for previously tested nuclear packages that would make the resulting bombs and warheads safer and more reliable over the long term than older stockpiled weapons that are being refurbished.
(snip/...)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/03/AR2006030301757.html?nav=rss_nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. pissing money away .....
.... and Red China will win without firing a shot ..... they are financing this madness and
sooner or later will own us. Way to go bush & company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. GIGADEATH
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 11:06 PM by bpilgrim


doesn't it just give you the warm-fuzzies, all over...

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. He's been working on getting more and better nukes since he's been
in office. Beware of what he's doing. The people running the pentagon were against all this, so he's been firing them slowly over the last few year and putting people in that agree with him. * is up to no good on anything having to do with nuclear bomb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yuck yuck yuck yuck yuck - in a handbasket.
Perversion rears its ugly head once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Reliable Replacement Warhead
Why it sounds as harmless as a K-car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. ya know, the people running this government really are insane . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. US signals abandonment of nuclear disarmament
US signals abandonment of nuclear disarmament

March 04, 2006, 09:15 gmt



One of the remaining Fat Man atomic
bomb cases, identical to the one that
was used to drop the A-bomb on
Nagasaki at the National Atomic
Museum in Albuquerque, New Mexico
© AFP/File Robyn Beck

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The United States has signaled its apparent abandonment of the goal of nuclear disarmament "for the foreseeable future" as it embarked on a quest for a new generation of more reliable nuclear warheads.

Although the term "nuclear disarmament" quietly disappeared from the Bush administration's vocabulary long ago, the statement by Linton Brooks, head the National Nuclear Security Administration, marked the first time a top government official publicly acknowledged a goal enshrined in key international documents will no longer be pursued.

"The United States will, for the foreseeable future, need to retain both nuclear forces and the capabilities to sustain and modernize those forces," Brooks stated Friday as he addressed the East Tennessee Economic Council in the city of Oak Ridge, which is home to a major nuclear weapons complex.

"I do not see any chance of the political conditions for abolition arising in my lifetime, nor do I think abolition could be verified if it were negotiated," he pointed out.
(snip/...)

http://www.bakutoday.net/afp/english/shared/int/060304081535.b76w5gj2.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. And some wonder
why other countries feel the need to still pursue nuclear weapons.

Oh well, atleast they aren't even acting like they care. For once they just came straight out and said "yeah we don't give a shit - we're keeping these nukes and we'll build more...What ya goin' to do about it?"

Arrogance, hypocrisy, bravado, and hubris all mixed into one with this administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Cheney and the Chimp would love to FRY a few brown and black men
They would however prefer to use NAPALM -- that way THEY could hear the darkies SCREAM and watch them WRITHE IN PAIN

THIS WILL SATISFY THEIR SICK SEXUAL URGES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyblue Donating Member (724 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. 1st build empire, then create nucular playland.
Then push the big red button.
3 states have missing nuclear fuel rods. VT, CT, and GA or SC I think.
What won't they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC