Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran Offers to Suspend Uranium Enrichment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:28 AM
Original message
Iran Offers to Suspend Uranium Enrichment
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1695870

By GEORGE JAHN

VIENNA, Austria Mar 7, 2006 (AP)— Iran is offering to suspend full-scale uranium enrichment for up to two years, a diplomat said Tuesday. The proposal reflected Tehran's attempts to escape U.N. Security Council action over the activity, which can be used to make nuclear arms.

The diplomat told The Associated Press the offer was made Friday by chief Iranian negotiator Ali Larijani in Moscow in the context of contacts between Iran and Russia on moving Tehran's enrichment program to Russia. The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity because the information was confidential.

---snip---

Moscow has become the sole negotiating partner of the Iranians in recent months. Diplomats familiar with those talks said Moscow was insisting on a full enrichment freeze of up to eight years, including small-scale activity.

In exchange, Russian negotiators promised to float a post-suspension resumption of limited work with centrifuges and other components of an enrichment program in talks with senior U.S. and European officials.

But strong U.S. opposition appeared close to sinking that Russian initiative.

more at link....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds fair to me..
Iran gives it up for two years WHILE Russia starts doing it and providing the final product to Iran.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I wish that Russia, the EU, China, and Iran would just come to an
agreement that satisfies all of them and leave the US out of it. The US is currently unable to participate in any reasonable international negotiations and should be shunned until it recovers its senses (if it ever does). If the rest of the powers in the world would just tell the US to STFU! everyone would be so much better off.

The object is not to punish Iran or crush them or humble them or whatever the fuck it is that the Naked Nazi wants; the idea is to arrive at a mutually acceptable outcome that allows everyone to proceed with their lives in peace. This is possible if the Insane States of America will just butt-out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. 100% agree - that is exactly what needs to happen
and I suspect probably will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. I think you're right. Plus their offer for a two year halt will put the
issue off the table until we are rid of this incompetent administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. It won't go anywhere...
as usual the idiot chimp will 'refuse to negotiate' and bomb the hell out of them. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed. Iran could completely cave to the demands of this regime and
* would bomb'em to hell anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Correct. War with Iran is a done deal. It's not about
nuclear weapons production.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. How dare they! n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sorta takes the wind out of Bolton's bloviating, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You'd think it would
but it won't. Doesn't matter if Iran complies with every demand we make 10 times over. As with Iraq, this is not about weapons or dictators - if it were there are other countries we would be threatening right now. This is about the neo-con agenda, and I fear they are going to push it as far as they can over the next couple of years :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EuroObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Cheney to the rescue
IRAN FACES "MEANINGFUL CONSEQUENCES" http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2150305

(Presumes to speak in the name of "the international community", furthermore).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. And this one, too >>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EuroObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Now Reuters: "Russia denies Iran atom offer"
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2006-03-07T195721Z_01_RON537891_RTRUKOC_0_UK-NUCLEAR-IRAN.xml

Tue Mar 7, 2006 7:57 PM GMT VIENNA (Reuters) - Russia on Tuesday backed away from what EU diplomats said was a proposal to let Iran do some atomic research if it agreed to refrain from enriching uranium on an industrial scale for 7-9 years.

Russia abandoned the informal proposal, aimed at finding a compromise to the crisis over Iran's nuclear programme, after Western rejection of the idea.

The United States and the European Union want Iran to shelve all work to enrich uranium because of suspicions that Tehran is secretly trying to make nuclear weapons.

U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney said on Tuesday that Iran would be stopped from getting atomic bombs and faced "meaningful consequences" if it persists in defying calls to stop nuclear work which could lead to weapons.

In defying calls to halt all enrichment-related work, Iran seems to be counting on divisions in the U.N. Security Council over whether to resort to sanctions mooted by the United States.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov denied after talks with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that he had made a new proposal to defuse a crisis over Iran's nuclear aspirations that the Security Council may soon tackle.

"There is no compromise new proposal," Lavrov said at a news conference with Rice, who added: "The Russians did not tell us of any new proposal ..."
...

"The Russians explored this idea with us," said a diplomat, who asked not to be identified, from one of the three EU states - Germany, France and Britain - working on the Iran issue, the so-called EU3.

The diplomat said when Lavrov "realised the EU3 and U.S. would not accept its elements, he decided to deny it to save face".

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. "Lavrov said at a news conference with Rice"....well now....
Isn't that special??


:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fitz! Where the hell are ya?
Any news conference announced yet?

(Re: Cheney = Conspired to commit, and commited, treason.)

Otherwise, no matter what happens (Saddam "offered" to negotiate too) the PNAC Lie$ "Machine" is ON (again), no matter what they say (or do).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Didn't they read the Downing street memos?
We're invading wether or not they have WMD's.

I applaud them for pissing the Bush Crime family off though. It will now take millions more in fear propaganda to convince Americans how dangerous Iran is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. it won't matter what they do
just like it didn't matter what saddam did prior to the iraq invasion, bushco. WILL have their war. they'll simply produce some 'evidence' of iranian shenanigans now and then, to build up a war fervor in the us. expect some atrocity stories and such, it should be a real show with fox news having exclusive rights to the juicy parts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Absolutely!
there is nothing that the usa demands of them that will satisfy the usa because the demands are not about satisfaction of the demands, it is about world domination by the usa. Bush wants Iran to agree to this domination..and nothing else will do. And a week ago, bush signs an agreement with India...to allow them to develop all the nuclear power that can be had...and with the help and sharing of info by the usa. There was a message there to Iran and the world...and it is that the USA will dominate...that they will demand the final word on which country can and which country cannot develop nuclear energy. World Domination is what it is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Too true. I hope that the US does not start another war and that if it
tries, that we all hit the streets and stay there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. like the Onion article, "Bush has stated that any Iraqi attempt to comply
with American demands will be regarded as an act of war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think Bush will refuse to take yes for an answer
Just like before the Iraq invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't get it.. WHY can INDIA have them? but not Iran??
Who does America think they are telling people who can have nuclear programs, when we have one. India hasn't signed the proliferation treaty.. but we give them Nuke technology...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Not only do we have one, but we engage in activities
that violate the NPT - like the one you mentioned, dealing nukes with India, as well as a new nuclear program we are embarking on here to replace our current arsenal.

H.Y.P.O.C.R.I.T.E.S!!!!

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. 3...2...1...SPIN IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. I hope they noticed that nothing Sadam did changed anything
Edited on Tue Mar-07-06 04:42 PM by RazzleDazzle
and that the Bush Administration did what they damn well pleased anyway, which was to attack and invade Iraq. Saddam was in the worst no-win situation I've ever seen in my life. And you KNOW things are bad when you begin, as I did, to have just an itsy bitsy bit of sympathy for a brutal dictator. Were I under the delusion that Iraq and Iraqis would be better off without him with Bush at the helm here, it wouldn't have been so tempting, but I knew better back then as did most DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. They (Iran) can make as...
Edited on Tue Mar-07-06 09:05 PM by Mr_Jefferson_24
...many conciliatory gestures as they wants (Iraq made many if you'll recall), King George wants them bombed with a follow up invasion and that's just what he's gonna order. The pretext is being laid, the attack is a foregone conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. Acquiescing didn't help Iraq.
Invasion's a done deal. We're just not privy to when.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC