Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US General: Iraq Shifting from Insurgency Toward Sectarian Violence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 03:56 PM
Original message
US General: Iraq Shifting from Insurgency Toward Sectarian Violence
The general who commands all U.S. military activities in the Middle East says the situation in Iraq is shifting from insurgency toward sectarian violence. At a U.S. Senate committee hearing, General John Abizaid said tension in Iraq is increasing, and the type of violence is changing.

"There's no doubt that the sectarian tensions are higher than we've seen," he said. "And it is of great concern to all of us. It's my belief that the security situation in the country, while changing in its nature from insurgency toward sectarian violence, is controllable by Iraqi security forces and multi-national forces."

Secretary Rumsfeld declined to say what role U.S. forces would play if a civil war broke out in Iraq. But he stressed that avoiding a civil war is as much a political issue as it is a military one.

"The situation, to the extent that it's fragile and tense, is as much a governance issue as it is a security issue," he added. "The need is for the principal players in that country to recognize the seriousness of the situation, and to come together to form a government of national unity that will govern from the center, and to do it in a reasonably prompt manner. And that will be what it will take, in my view, to further calm the situation."

http://www.voanews.com/english/2006-03-09-voa46.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. But it's not a civil war
and don't you forget it. Rummy will let us know when it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ass-Clowns
"Can I have a kiss ?", He pleaded

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. He Noticed That Today, Did He, Sir?
"There's always some sonuvabitch 'at's slow to get the word!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Bush cabal has no interest in creating law and order in Iraq.
As myself and many here predicted long ago. The US will allow Iraq to devolve into civil war as long as the oil facilities are secure. The corporate cabal did not invade Iraq for the good of the Iraqi people - far from it. The corporate cabal is only interested in controlling oil, in Iraq and elsewhere. Iraqi cities can burn for all the cabal cares. US troops will hunker down and guard oil facilities and rarely venture into Iraqi cities on security missions. The cabal does want to keep US casualties low, not out of compassion, but for purely political motives.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GDAEx2 Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Does that mean
"Mission Accomplished"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rummy et all talk to the offiical leaders--here we are dealing with the
clergy. big gap.

"The situation, to the extent that it's fragile and tense, is as much a governance issue as it is a security issue," he added. "The need is for the principal players in that country to recognize the seriousness of the situation, and to come together to form a government of national unity that will govern from the center, and to do it in a reasonably prompt manner. And that will be what it will take, in my view, to further calm the situation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sectarian violence = civil war.
In a sense, they are finally admitting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. rummy voted for insurgency before he voted against it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC