Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. puts machine-guns on Great Lakes coast guard vessels

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:10 PM
Original message
U.S. puts machine-guns on Great Lakes coast guard vessels
U.S. puts machine-guns on Great Lakes coast guard vessels
Last Updated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:00:53 EST
CBC News

For the first time since 1817, U.S. Coast Guard vessels on the Great Lakes are being outfitted with weapons – machine-guns capable of firing 600 bullets a minute.

The War of 1812 saw violent battles on Lake Erie and Lake Huron between U.S. troops and British forces, which were largely composed of militias from Britain's colonies in what is now Canada. After the war, the United States and Britain – and later Canada – agreed to demilitarize the Great Lakes waters.

The Rush-Bagot Treaty of 1817 allowed each country to station four vessels, each equipped with an 18-pound cannon, to safeguard the Great Lakes.

The antiquated treaty has recently been reinterpreted because of U.S. concerns about customs violations, human smuggling and international terrorism.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/03/15/coastguard-060315.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
49jim Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I live just off the shore
of Lake Ontario.....I feel safer now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. We live on Lake Erie
I can see them shooting the beach goers this summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. Hi neighbor
Fulton here. Theres a Coast Guard Unit stationed there too.

I have a friend that works security at 9 mile, he says FEMA has been there for a few weeks running training exercises that doesn't include any of the current security teams.His scheduled hours are very weird. 3 days on 3 days off all hours he has never been scheduled.

I bet you feel even safer now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
46. And I live right across the lake from you
And I'm stayin' the hell away from the beach in Kingston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. They need the guns to keep Americans from sneaking
into Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. To get those illegal Rx Drugs
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
52. Well it's a long cold swim
and the gene splicing for fresh water sharks is still a decade away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. Yes - but it can be done. My father & uncle used to do it when they were
kids.

Start off at the mouth of the Niagara River - swim UPSTREAM - and end up just past Grand Island by the time they crossed.

Not for the physically weak, tho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Come on, I've been hearing for years about armed smugglers
When I heard about it there wasn't much hope of doing anything about the problem. If it wasn't the Bush Administration doing this, the only people who'd complain are right wing militias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. From Canada?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Blah
Coast guard boats usually carry the M-60.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They are putting M-2 , 50 cals and above on their cutters
I hear 20mm and maybe bigger

That should kick some ass on a few demonstrators who use boats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
45. I saw a Coast Guard vessel equipped with a Phalanx system docked....
in San Diego a few years ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's not overstate this either
The guns we are talking about are 7.62mm machine guns -- the same round that's found in a .308 hunting rifle.

This is being done with the consent and agreement of Canada according to TFA.

Both sides reserve the right to use up to 50-cal machine guns.

I don't think the UK has explicitly signed off on this (like Canada has). That being said, the UK isn't really that important in this since they no longer have colonies in the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
49. Yeah...
I am surprised they don't already carry somethign similar to the 7.62

I mean, they ARE a military branch. Calling them a 'machine-gun' makes them sound like war machines, but a 7.62 isn't much really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. We must fight the bacon there, or we'll have to eat the bacon here. n/t
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 10:58 PM by corporatemedia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do we invade Canada before or after Iran? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeltaLady Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Thanks for the best laugh
I've had in too long.

Delta
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devinsgram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
54. That will depend on how much oil they've got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Waste of Money...wtf...
What the fuck are they going to shoot?

I;ve spent countless hours sailing on Lake Michigan and first...there is zero reason for weapons on Lake Michigan.

2nd tell me terrorists are going to navigate across Lake Superior....and land in Wisconsin....rrrrrriiiiight......like people cross lake superior everyday in small pleasure craft....(not)

It takes serious seamanship with a serious boat either power or sail to spend any considerable amount of time on the great lakes. Particulalry any passage that takes you beyond five miles from safe harbor.


That is a bunch of shit.

Some jackass will get trigger happy and fill some party barge full of holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. ya, Canada's next..right after Iran..
Ah excuse me George..your patrolling the wrong effing border..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Canada geese have been shitting all over American lawns
The way Bush has been shitting all over American laws. It has to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeltaLady Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Either I've finally lost my mind
or y'all are getting high marks in the dry wit and humor category tonight. I really needed it. Rough night on the delta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
50. from a recent IRC session
"Canada, please come get your geese. They're shitting all over the parking lot."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. well, actually

The ports of Chicago and Indiana have a little drug smuggling problem.....could get nasty if the 'drug war' escalates any further.

I'm all for it. I'd like for Chicago and Indiana to not be a courier for a bunch of drug addicts in the far suburbs and out east.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. What kind of drug smuggling problem....
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 11:05 AM by LeftHander
Any recent seizures....?

Are they in fast cigarette racing boats running cocaine from Toronto?


99.9% of the Drug ploblems in the midwest come from local Meth labs.

Not for militarization of the Great Lakes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. uh no...

Chicago is the transportation nerve center for the United States, and the drug lords would dearly like to control it and use the infrastructure to do their dirty business - by rail, by boat, by truck. If things got out of hand, there could be violence, because Chicago doesn't want the drug trade in their backyard and the feds have set up shop here.

Chicago has more heroin addicts than any city in the country - ever wonder why? It's obvious why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. I don't see how machine guns on Coast Guard
Vessels is going to do anyhing.....

Waht are they going to do drive up the river and spray bullets into "smuggler" vessels...or wage a gun battle on the docks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
57. Think Niagara River or Detroit River - much shorter easier to do.
I'm only commenting on the distance/ease part - not the continuing example of REPUKE idiocy in the plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. If you have ever been attacked by those Canadian
Black-flies, a Nuke would be justified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. Yeah, I've noticed they send their geese down here once a year.
Probably for reconnaissance purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. Are they going to be using DU (Depleted Uranium) rounds?
.
.
.

Start their own little genocide of us Canuks with every shot fired?

They gotta "practice" ya know - so they'll be firing (hopefully) into the water

But wherever the USA uses them they will kill for millenniums . . . .

"DU has been used as a field weapon by NATO since the beginning of the 1990s. During Operation Desert Storm, American M1A1, M1, and M60 tanks and British Challenger tanks fired thousands of large calibre DU missiles. American A-10 and AV-8B aircraft shot hundreds of thousands of small calibre DU rounds. American snipers shot 7.62mm and .50 calibre DU bullets. "

/snip/

30 metric tonnes of DU ammunition (300,000 rounds in all) were used on the Kuwait / Iraq border as part of "Operation Desert Storm"…. And it was to here that British low-level radiation expert Dr Chris Busby travelled … what Busby discovered surprised him. Soil samples showed lower levels of contamination than he expected. But his air samples revealed levels of ionising radiation in the atmosphere around the battlefield 10 times higher than in the nearby city of Basra and 20 times higher than in Baghdad. (Observer, 07/01/01)

There has been a fourfold increase in cancers in those areas of southern Iraq where fighting took place,
says Dr Jawad Khadim Al-Ali, a member of the UK Royal College of Physicians. The Independent's Robert Frisk talks of "old men, young women with terrible tumours, whole families suffering from unexplained leukaemias..., children with internal bleeding.... Ahmed Fleah had already died in the children's ward, bleeding from his mouth, ears, nose and rectum. He took two weeks to bleed to death."

http://www.futuretrust.org/essay3a.html

Genocide, one round at a time

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. There are tungsten-core bullets in 7.62x51mm and .50 caliber,
but not depleted uranium bullets. The smallest caliber I'm aware of that has ever fired DU cored rounds is the 20mm Phalanx CIWS system that used to be the mainstay of ship defense. Small-arms armor-piercing rounds have always been either hardened steel or tungsten core.

If DU ammunition for the 7.62x51 and .50 BMG existed, then it would be a simple matter to find the military M-number for that load. I googled high and low, and there's apparently no such thing.

If you google "depleted uranium sniper", you get a bunch of sci-fi game forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #23
44. The article I quoted specifically says "7.62mm and .50 calibre DU bullets"
.
.
.


"American snipers shot 7.62mm and .50 calibre DU bullets."


I even posted the link to that article

Another article states:

In addition, the Army has tested limited quantities of small caliber DU ammunition (5.56mm, 7.62mm and 50 caliber).<213> However, the Army produced these rounds in limited quantities for developmental testing only and evaluation and never type-classified them for standard use. Some veterans claim to have fired 50-caliber DU sniper rounds during the Gulf War, but this claim could not be supported after numerous interviews with the manufacturer of the 50 caliber sniper rifle, with ammunition suppliers, and with the DoD logisticians responsible for small caliber ammunition

http://www.deploymentlink.osd.mil/du_library/du_ii/du_ii_tabe.htm

Last Update: December 13, 2000 -

http://www.deploymentlink.osd.mil/du_library/du_ii/index.htm

If the US were testing them over 6 years ago,

well before Afghanistan and Iraq

I bet my butt they used, and are using them.

That's just my Canuk Opinion tho . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. I saw that claim...
but considered it to be an error. It is a known fact that DU ammunition has been issued in calibers down to 20mm. Nothing smaller. If an article claims the contrary, especially as an aside, it needs specifics to have any credibility at all.

Your second link does nothing to dispute the fact that no DU ammunition has been issued for small arms; a small quantity were allegedly produced for testing, never issued, because in calibers that small, the gain over standard tungsten-core AP ammunition is negligible. The U.S. once tested nuclear-powered airplanes, too...

American snipers do not use DU small arms ammunition. If they did, it would have an M-number (even special ops stuff gets M-numbers). They use standard match ammunition (lead-core), tungsten-core AP, incendiary, and in the case of the .50 there is the special Raufoss explosive ammunition which is considered both AP and incendiary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. Last reply bE, it's people like you why innocent Iraqis are still dying
.
.
.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
55. Patrolling the Loop w/ depleted uranium is a bad idea.
Firing depleted uranium into the drinking water supply is also a bad idea.

They shut down the skeet ranges along the lake shore because people did not want the lead in their drinking water.

---------

Aside from the toxic rounds I don't have a problem Coast Guard machine guns.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. Have there been any armed confrontations?
There must be some justification, or is this basic intimidation.

Be afraid.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theres-a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. It's pandemic protection
When the geese try to migrate down here,they will be exterminated.By bikini girls with machine guns.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Giant Robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. Bikini girls with machine guns
Am I the only one that wants to listen to the Cramps right now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theres-a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Ha!
I wondered why that phrase popped into my head!I was a big cramps fan way back when.B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Giant Robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. I was hoping I got that right!
The Cramps kicked ass back in the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. Those Whitefish are in for a surprise
Wait till they meet our "little friend"!

And the Zebra mussels, who boy! Do we have a surprise for them!

Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Someone trying to pump up the price of Gefilte Fish?
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 07:54 AM by formercia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
26. Anyone else ever spot a submarine docked at a Coast Guard station?
Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I can see the headline now.
Iranian 'Boomer' spotted in the Great Lakes.


Biggest scam since 'Nessie'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. You got it wrong, we're talking "friendlies" and "research subs" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
59. Well, I don't know about at a Coast Guard station,
but in Manitowoc WI, there is a submarine museum - not too far from the Two Rivers Nuclear Power Plant. I suppose it's merely a matter of time before the 'museum' is reactivated by the Dept of Homeland Security to deliver radioactive matl to Canada...

No proof, you understand - Just sayin'....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
29. It seems like it could be a useful thing
But the US/Canada border is a peaceful place, for the most part. Unless Bob Probert is crossing or something.

There have been a lot of drug interdictions at the border, but it hasn't been boating traffic. They've been using garbage trucks and other land-based vehicles to smuggle it in (mostly pot, but sometimes cocaine).

It's kind of like they're giving the smugglers some ideas to use routes they weren't already using.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. Two reasons.
(1) Machine guns to stop Canadians from trying to smuggle medications into the U.S. Everybody knows that Canadian drugs aren't safe; that's why our govt. is trying to stop the importation of them. I mean, every day we hear of Canadians dropping dead in the streets from their unsafe drugs. :eyes:

(2) Machine guns will also stop Canadians from trying to sneak over here & use our healthcare system, which is superior to theirs, since they don't allow people to die due to lack of money to pay for medical treatment. :eyes: </sarcasm>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. So ends the "Worlds longest undefended border".
What a sad day :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Yes, it is a sad day n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Harper probably thought it a good idea.
Of all people, he knows how dangerous Canuckistanis can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
38. Somehow I think they're more worried we'd escape
than canada invade.

It would be the loss of uneducated cheap labor. It fits in with the pell grant cut and food program cuts. The nation is supposed to be dumb and hungry, and happy for the sweat shops. It explains all the education cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
40. Damn that Soviet Canuckistan plot to take over the Lakes!
Must.defend.against.invaders.from.Great.White.North.eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
41. Today's GOP: Building that Bridge to 1812!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
42. My Gawd, They're After Our Beer!
Shoot to kill, everyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
47. Is "Canadian Bacon" available at Comcast's "On Demand"?
It just seems so appropriate.

I'm gonna go look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
58. Watch out when Chicago tries to secede from the fascist union
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC