Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(NYT) (extinct) Ivory-Billed Woodpecker ID is Disputed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:29 PM
Original message
(NYT) (extinct) Ivory-Billed Woodpecker ID is Disputed
.


Ivory-Billed Woodpecker Identification Is Disputed


by JAMES GORMAN, New York Times, Published March 16, 2006

David A. Sibley, one of the country's top bird experts, said today that the woodpecker that appears fleetingly in a blurry videotape taken in an Arkansas swamp, in a discovery that electrified the world of birding last year, was not an ivory-billed woodpecker after all.



photo: Associated Press
An artist rendering of the ivory-billed woodpecker,
as provided by the journal Science in 2005.


Instead, Mr. Sibley and three colleagues write in the journal Science, the bird is a common pileated woodpecker, and there is no conclusive evidence that the near-mythical ivory bill has escaped extinction.

The (blurry video-)tape was made on April 25, 2004, by M. David Luneau Jr., an electronics and computers professor at the University of Arkansas, Little Rock. Along with eyewitness sightings, it was the centerpiece of a spring 2005 paper in the same journal that sparked great public excitement, a commitment of $10 million in federal funds for ivory-bill conservation, and jubilation among conservationists and birders.

The majestic ivory bill, the largest woodpecker in the United States, had been a poignant example of extinction from the last confirmed American sighting in 1944 until the report of the rediscovery, when it quickly became a symbol of hope, embraced by birders and the public.

. . . more at . . . http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/16/science/16cnd-bird.html
(NYT may require freebie registration . . . go to bugmenot.com to get username, password)

(bold-faced type emphasis added by TaleWgnDg)


.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sad, if true. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. The pileated woodpecker is big
and if there was nothing to compare it to, I could see where it might be thought as being the ivory-billed. The thing that gets me, though, is that the call of the ivory billed is said to be distinctive, and they have audio tapes from that area that have the call. They've aired them on AETN, the statewide educational network here in Arkansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They're the most similar species
and they do overlap in range. That's why that must have been the possibility they worked the hardest to eliminate first, wouldn't you think? I would think they would've wanted to be pretty dang sure it wasn't the more common Pileated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. In a recent Scientific American,
as a follow up to the much older videotape story, a crew of learned enthusiasts confirmed the discovery. I haven't read the NYT story, must depend on the snip, but, unless they've included the followup, their story is incomplete and misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. This dispute has been going on for the entire time since the discovery
The authors know what pileated woodpeckers look like, and excluded them as a possibility in their findings. It will be interesting to see why Sibley et al think that they are incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. The NY Times fails to mention
that the expert they are relying on -- David Sibley -- also happens to write a weekly feature on birds that is syndicated by the New York Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. I want to believe the IBW's are still around
somewhere. And Passenger Pigeons too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC