Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman says Bush wiretapping 'outside the law'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:33 PM
Original message
Lieberman says Bush wiretapping 'outside the law'

http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2006/03/26/lieberman_says_bush_wiretapping_outside_the_law/

Lieberman says Bush wiretapping 'outside the law'

HARTFORD, Conn. --President Bush's authorization of warrantless wiretapping as part of the war on terrorism was "outside the law," Sen. Joe Lieberman said Sunday.

Lieberman, D-Conn., also said he opposes a move by a Democratic Senate colleague to censure Bush over accusations that the president unlawfully authorized wiretaps without obtaining court orders.

"As I read the law I think the president's tapping or surveillance without a warrant was wrong," Lieberman said on "Face the State" on WFSB-TV. "It was outside the law."

"This is an important program," said Lieberman, who is seeking a fourth term this year. "I don't find anybody in Congress who thinks we ought not to be listening to the phone conversations and reading the e-mails of people that we think are involved in and we have reason to believe are involved in terrorist groups. But it has to be done in America in my opinion pursuant to the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. It has to be done with a court order."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Hell just froze over a little.
Lieberman *almost* went against Bush completely on something. My word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. The level of conflict has reached a critical point
Lieberman: "What you did was outside the law."

Bush: "I hear you, but you are outside sanity."

Lieberman: "How dare you! Are you calling me insane?"

Bush: "You're not paying attention to the nuances here. I never said you were insane. You might be outsane."

Lieberman: "You person who, while remaining within the law, strays too close to the boundary!"

Bush: "Those are fighting words."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #40
79. LOL Limpmann the DINO
What a slug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
50. Nah, just a light frost
Lieberman's runnin' scared now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #50
64. Light frost is right. He's gotta long way to go to become tundra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
52. Lookie, the Repukes are fighting amoung themselves!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #52
67. You made me almost spew my drink over my computer!
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 11:09 PM by TankLV
That was PRICELESS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
59. you took the words out of my mouth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
61. Nah, it's just a wee bit colder.
Lieberman thinks b*s* broke the law, but shouldn't even be censured?

What the fuck EVER, you fucking idiot!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
66. Yeah - BUT he's still giving him a PASS!
If it's "against the law" - it's an IMPEACHABLE offense you asswipe!, let alone AT LEAST worthy of CENSURE!

God I can't wait till this TRAITOR GOP MOLE to the Democratic Party is GONE!

He is SUCH a loser!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. What?
Oh, yeah. Joe has a primary challenger.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Holy Joe is worried
Ned Lamont is getting backing. Lieberman may back down and lose his love of
Bush till after the November election, then he'll go right back to being the
Republican parties greatest gift. Don't let him fool you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. Thats what a lot of the Repugs are doing now...
as soon as the election is over and if they win, all of the arrogance will show up and they will really believe they have a mandate, and will be worser than we think now they are just waiting. If they win I believe this country will not be able to take anymore and I wonder what the results will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. exactly - a lot of us have called his office and said we're
sending money to Lamont if LIEberman doesn't support censure.

LIEbermans office staff seemed a bit stunned by the calls. But ya know what, holy Joe? I'm sending my money to Lamont NO MATTER WHAT THE F**K YOU DO.

Time for holy Joe to retire, or switch to the Repuke party in NAME as well as votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
54. Just got email from Ned Lamont staffer-Ned needs more contributors to send
$$ to: www.nedlamont.com. Gist of email is that the number of contributors is more important than the amount given at this point to get into a primary vs. Lieberbush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #54
75. Done
20 bucks for Ned. All I can afford right now.

Joe needs some down time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
65. He made his reputation, now he's gotta lay in it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. ok Joe let me get this straight
wiretapping is "outside the law" yet you dont agree with calls for a censure?
Outside the law means he broke the law doesnt it?
Am I crazy for thinking this??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. It's called "having your cake and eating it too"...
while in a desperate drive for reelection.

What a mug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. thank you monktoman..my sentiments exactly..wtf joe?? censure
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 02:01 PM by flyarm
for a bj lie..a lie...under oath that reached the impeachment stage..but shitting on our constitution destroying the branches of government..a pres who thinks he is above the law..admits it and says he will keep doing it until someone stops the fucker..and that is not worthy of censure joementum????????

so joe is basically saying he is for destroying the relevance of congress...joe is for destroying the constitution and bill of rights..joe is for destroying and separations of power our laws demand...and our forefathers tried to protect us from..well it seems to me joementum is a supporter of dictatorship..so tell us joe..why was it we went to war in iraq??

oh yeah ..to remove a dictator...

i despise that weasle !

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
62. Ironically, Lieberman is enabling the very type of fascist...
...that killed so many of his people in WWII.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. So true, so true.
So very sad.

And frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #62
73. Many abused children grow up to be child-abusers.
As a Jew, I can tell you some of us reacted to the Holocaust by becoming opposed to fascism, bigotry and scapegoating in ALL its forms (this is the message, unspoken but unmistakable, that I was raised with and also was an idea underlying a lot of the civil rights movement, I think). Others reacted by becoming opposed to fascism, bigotry and scapegoating when it was directed against them, but felt okay using similar techniques to protect themselves and their loved ones. I was really hit by this the first time I saw it, and I think it is quite analagous to the abused child sydrome.

I see Joe as one of the deluded crowd that feel they can compensate for their feeling of fear and vulnerability by cozying up to the big bad dictator. Maybe after he loses the primary he can spend some time looking at pictures of Iraq torture victims and perhaps rethink his position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. Congress should spend time debating whether
to write a new law requiring Prez to go through the court as specified in the present law ??? Oh yes, this really makes sense. Is this bumbling idiot for real ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Joe must be getting squeemish about his election HA HA HA
But heres the question Joe if push comes to shove would you vote Impeach Bush for breaking the law or would you give him a kiss!!!:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. If you can't impress them with the facts
dazzle them with the bulls*t. Atta way Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. This just in: Joe remembers his party registration!
But fear not, Mr. Preznit, another day or two and he'll forget it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ok, Joe. Just lead the posse to arrest Dubya, and we'll forgive you.
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 01:43 PM by leveymg
Knew you didn't have it in you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Joeforcement!
Do the crime, do no time. Think of the money we'll save in prison expenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. !!!!!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. LOL. . .
very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
63. I guess that's his form of, er, "Joe-stice".
*cringes*

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. "outside the law"..
... just say it Joe, you won't melt into a puddle, "it was ILLEGAL".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Wondered how many posts I'd have to read before someone used
the word illegal. Which is something old phony Joe is too squeamish to do. He'd have to take a real stand against his bud if he used that word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
41. You know, right next to "inside the law."
They stand so close together it's hard to tell sometimes.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Holy Joe says Bushie is wrong!?!
:wow: :wow: :wow:

Somebody slap me, please and tell me I'm not dreaming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Your dreaming... go back to sleep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Thanks for the reassurance
For a minute there, I was worried things might be looking up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. Message to Joe: Then DO SOMETHING to stop it!
In short,

DO YOUR FUCKING JOB!

Sorry about the language, I'm just SO SICK of these people making statements about the things this administration is doing that are wrong, illegal, "outside the law," etc., and then DO NOTHING TO STOP IT.

GET OFF YOUR FAT, LAZY ASS AND PUT A STOP TO THE ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES!!!


This is not a difficult concept to grasp, but no one seems to follow through except for a few like Feingold. I'm sick of the patronizing remarks. It's time FOR ACTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah it's illegal but you know
we're not going to do something crazy like hold the lawbreaker accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. If I didn't know better...
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 01:51 PM by sendero
... I'd say Joe is feeling the heat. Nothing, but NOTHING motivates these fuckers in congress like the very thought that their perk-encrusted job is at stake.

Your job is at stake Joe. Believe it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Too little, Too late
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. Soft on crime Lieberman? Is "outside the law' a euphemism for
illegally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
57. I guess that makes * an out-law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. Wha...are we shocked?
Ol' Joe is just being Ol' Joe. Claims "it is outside the law"...and then saying he would not back the censor of the President for stepping outside that LAW. Just being middle of the road Joe...talking outside his puckered mouth, that is pressed so firmly on the GOP's butt. Just tossed a "See I am a Democrat bone"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's outside the law, so let's change the law - that's Joe's idea of the
remedy.

"My own opinion, and it seems to be shared by most Democratic senators, is that it would be an unproductive use of our time," Lieberman said. "Again, it's looking backward. It would be divisive. The best thing we could do about this program is to bring it under the law and I'd prefer to spend my time and the Senate's time figuring out how we can adopt a law that allows the administration to continue this program but force them to go to court to get a warrant before they do."

Doing your f'ing job and upholding the Constitution is not an "unproductive use of your time". Whoring with Bushco and Lobbyists is the waste. Sheesh, I "dislike" this f-er.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
55. that does it, I am ready to send my check to nedlamont.com & vote for Ned
in the primary we WILL have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
28. Wow!
Lieberman, who never takes a stand against Bush, and even tries to get us to unite in support of him because of the war, now is willing to admit in public that Chimp is "outside the law." That phrase is where the word "outlaw" comes from. Think about that, Holy Joe, Chimp is an outlaw. Why does he think an outlaw shouldn't be censured?

Maybe this is more about Ned Lamont and reading articles critical of Lieberman has something to do with this, rather than a change of heart on Joe's part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. Ned Lamont for US Senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Any story with Lieberman's name in it
should simply be followed up by your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
56. Ned needs contributors giving even small amount of $$, to get a primary:
www.nedlamont.com---the number of contributors is more important than size of contribution, according to email I just got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierogi_Pincher Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #56
76. Am sending contrib. for Lamont cause.
Our roots are in Connecticut. Have family there. Still miss it bad.

ATTAWAY NED! :loveya:

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
32. are lieberman's poll numbers going down to?
}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. Gosh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
35. The question is...
What is he, as a United States Senator, going to do about it?

Of course Bush broke the law. And because we are a nation of laws, we have remedies in place even when Presidents break the law. And one of those remedies is called impeachment.

I also find it oddly curious that Lieberman has been silent about the fact that some members of the Republican Party want to provide Bush with political cover by writing the program into law.

When was the last time Congress retroactively made an illegal program legal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
36. It Took an Election Year for this Enlightening Comment?
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 03:50 PM by benny05
Kool-aid shortages everywhere, I guess.

Sorry; I've been very disappointed in Leiberman's voting record, especially on SCOTUS.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
37. SOMEbody isn't gonna be the defense secretary...
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 03:53 PM by Tiggeroshii
Is he really ready to give up that position? He nearly had it guaranteed for him with Rummy soaring very near the dirt lately....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenergy Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
39. What an idiot. He's clueless n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
42. Still on the Sunday shows
jeopardizing the Dems chances in 2006.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
43. Lieberwimp is the WORST excuse for a Democrat EVER...
I can only hope that he loses his Senate seat, so we will be rid of his sorry ass. I can't stand the fucker.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
44. Notice the past tense?
..."was" wrong. It "was" outside the law.

Still clueless after all these years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
45. A LITTLE TOO LATE HOLY JOE!!!
The guy is shaking because Lamont is actually getting some recognition.


LAMONT 2006!!! :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
46. I think Holy Joe is hearing Ned Lamont's footsteps behind him
and he has been forced to say that his lover Bush acted outside the law, but no penalty!

What a scumbag!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
47. this is big
Pretty soon Soledad O'Brien will be the only one still pretending Bush didn't break the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
48. Lieberman is worried about Lamont
and his precious Senate seat.

See what a little pressure can do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
49. "Outside the law...you know, like the A-Team!"
:eyes:

Joe, Joe, Joe. Please. I'm taking up a collection for you to just sit the hell down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
51. What the hell? Is Holy Joe coming home???
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 06:50 PM by Prisoner_Number_Six
I think the fact that he actually has some real competition has shaken him up a bit. Wanna bet we get more than one mea culpa from him in the near future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
53. Just fucking say illegal
Why coddle the language to make it sound more pleasing, Christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
58. It's nice to see he finally got this far
Now, com'on, Joe, repeat after me:

  • The war was a big mistake and no one was liberated.

  • Iraq was not a threat to the US or any one else in the Spring of 2003.

  • The war was started because Bush and his team lied to gain support for it.

  • Lying to start a war of aggression is both an impeachable offense and a war crime.


  • That wasn't so hard, was it?
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 08:44 PM
    Response to Original message
    60. I wonder how he got his tongue out of Shrub's ass long enough to speak!
    Of course, he hardly used it once it was out, and it went right back in, no doubt.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:19 PM
    Response to Reply #60
    69. Of course it's back in - widdwl howwwy joe wicks his widdwl pacifier.
    But sucking on bunkerboy's dick all day long, with your head up his ass is sooooo gay, and downright HARD WORK, isn't it joe?!
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    kaygore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:19 PM
    Response to Original message
    70. May Joe Lieberman rot in hell and may he be unemployed within the next few
    Go, Ned, go!
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:39 PM
    Response to Original message
    71. I sent Joe an email saying he'd better censure, but I guess not I
    support Ned then!!
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:02 AM
    Response to Original message
    72. Okay, Joe, that's a step toward recovery from shrubcaholism
    "As I read the law I think the president's tapping or surveillance without a warrant was wrong," Lieberman said on "Face the State" on WFSB-TV. "It was outside the law."

    Good, Joe, shows you can read and understand the law and you understand what * is doing.

    Lieberman said. "Again, it's looking backward. It would be divisive. The best thing we could do about this program is to bring it under the law and I'd prefer to spend my time and the Senate's time figuring out how we can adopt a law that allows the administration to continue this program but force them to go to court to get a warrant before they do."

    Not so great, Joe. The law already "forces them to go to court to get a warrant before they do". You already noted that "this program" "was outside the law" (see 'Good, Joe', above). So it is not possible to both "continue this program" AND "force them to go to court to get a warrant before they do".

    My question for Joe would be this: "Who are they spying on that the FISA court would not give a warrant. The FISA court has a reputation for being pretty lax--almost always grants a warrant. So presumably if there is any hint that someone might be connected to terrorism, it would be easy to get a warrant. Who do you suppose they might be spying on BESIDES suspected terrorists? Could it be peace groups? Political opposition in general? All political groups and persons? Is this maybe why the FISA court was set up in the first place?"

    Personally, I kind of disagree with Joe, since I'd like to see the (illegal parts of the) program DIScontinued, not continued and I'd rather see the law followed instead of 'adopted'.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 03:13 AM
    Response to Original message
    74. Gee, what was yer first clue, Lieberman.
    Stupid MFer.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:32 AM
    Response to Original message
    77. Oh please......
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:50 AM
    Response to Original message
    78. So Lieberman is opposed to censuring law breakers if the law breaker
    Edited on Mon Mar-27-06 09:50 AM by yellowcanine
    is the president because "we have more important things to do". Or am I missing something?
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 12:13 PM
    Response to Original message
    Advertisements [?]
     Top

    Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

    Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
    Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


    Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

    Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

    About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

    Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

    © 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC