Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Panel Approves Immigration Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:39 PM
Original message
Senate Panel Approves Immigration Bill
http://news.yahoo.com/fc/US/Immigration
WASHINGTON - The Senate Judiciary Committee approved election-year immigration legislation Monday that clears the way for millions of undocumented workers to seek U.S. citizenship without having to first leave the country.



After days of street demonstrations that stretched from California to the gounds of the U.S. Capitol, the committee also voted to strip out proposed criminal penalties for residents found to be in this country illegally.

The panel's vote cleared the way for the full Senate to begin debate Tuesday on the emotional immigration issue.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. No one has an opinion on this LBN?
I think it is fairly "hugh111"
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL.
This seems to be a difficult subject around here.

Thanks for posting the link for us cuberats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No problem!
Should be one helluva debate to watch
on C-span...
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. I have LOTS of opinions about this
but expressing anything but the status quo, PC, faux liberal POV will get one accused of racism around here by those who largely have never been affected by the consequences of this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Looks good so far
...at least a lot better than it could be. That other legislation scares the bejeesus outta me. It's good there's going to be some effort to practice civility with this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightingIrish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. If the final bill look ssomething like this, the Republican idiots
in the house who voted for Sensenbrenner's bill are going to look pretty stupid for kissing off the Hispanic vote for nothing. I can see my Republican representative getting voted out on this one issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. yes, that is exactly what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemFromMem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nice to see the Dems united and the GOP splintered
I watched the Judiciary Committee hearing from the start this morning until the final vote at day's end (I'm an immigration lawyer so I'm obviously interested in what will represent the most comprehensive immigration bill in a generation). It was a riveting day especially for those of us who have been deeply involved in this debate. One Democratic amendment after another passed while the more meanspirited GOP provisions fell by the wayside. Senator Durbin probably had the best day. His DREAM Act to legalize teenagers who make good grades and go to college or the military is something he has pushed for a couple of years and he got it added to the bill. He also was the Senator who got the awful criminalization provisions removed. Senator Kennedy's version of guest worker and legalization provisions passed. And the committee was able to get a bill out to meet Senator Frist's deadline. So the Frist immigration bill (which only had crackdown provisions and nothing to help people legalize) will be withdrawn and Senator Frist will schedule the largely Democratic bill for a floor debate starting this week.

This was a good day for the Dems. GOP members who either have a conscience or see the writing on the wall are at odds with the members of their party who love wedge issues. The problem is that while a large portion of the public is concerned about this issue, most rate it relatively low on their list of priorities (recent polls showed immigration well down the list of priorities). But one group - the 30 million Hispanics in this country - rate it number one.

David Brooks said in a column last week that if the Republicans are perceived as being anti-immigration and thwarting a guest worker program, they can kiss Florida and the Southwest goodbye for a generation. So this is win-win for us. If the Republicans go along with the Democrats and Bush (odd that the President can count on more support from our party on this issue than his own), then it will be good news for the country. And if the Republican drink the Kool-Aid and pass an enforcement-only bill or kill legislation all together, than they'll be shooting themselves in the foot and it could cost them the 2006 election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Kerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks for the nice summary.
I am relieved that the issue is being approached responsibly and not emotionally, despite the utmost efforts of folks like Dobbs, Sensenbrenner, Tancredo, etc. We are a nation of immigrants and opportunity. I'm glad it's showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I watched most in morning. Yes, saw the Dem amendments pass and
was jumping --GO GO GO>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I realize there is a long way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. I am glad to see this from the Senate committee.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060328/ap_on_go_co/immigration&printer=1;_ylt=AjQn5BmR1uSW29Z660I0feSMwfIE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE-
Senate Panel Approves Immigration Bill

By SUZANNE GAMBOA, Associated Press WriterTue Mar 28, 3:16 AM ET

Immigrant supporters claimed their first major victory since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks after a bipartisan group of senators approved legislation that would give millions of illegal immigrants a chance at citizenship.

"It's a big day for us. We may not have a lot of big days, but this is a big day," Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a pro-immigrant group, said after the Senate Judiciary Committee approved a package of immigration and border security measures Monday.

Restaurant owners, agricultural groups, Democrats and others who had been pushing for a way for immigrants to earn legal permanent residency — the first step to citizenship — also claimed victory.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. also Leahy brought up the huge domonstrations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. Here are the provisions for the people already here.



...McCain said the turnouts in the hundreds of thousands — particularly among Hispanics — at recent rallies in Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington helped galvanize support for the bill.

In general, the Judiciary Committee's bill is designed to strengthen enforcement of U.S. borders, regulate the flow into the country of guest workers and determine the legal future of the estimated 11 million immigrants living in the United States illegally.

The bill would double the Border Patrol and authorize a "virtual wall" of unmanned vehicles, cameras and sensors to monitor the U.S.-Mexico border. It also would allow more visas for nurses and agriculture workers, and shelter humanitarian organizations from prosecution if they provide non-emergency assistance to illegal residents.

The most contentious provision would permit illegal aliens currently in the country to apply for citizenship without first having to return home, a process that would take at least six years. They would have to pay a fine, learn English, study American civics, demonstrate they had paid their taxes and take their place behind other applicants for citizenship, according to aides to Kennedy, D-Mass., who was instrumental in drafting the legislation......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. the Repug strategy is us the word amnesty to trigger hate.





.....Soon after assuming the presidency, Bush called for measures to provide businesses with a reliable immigrant work force. After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks he put aside negotiations with Mexico on a guest worker program. Mexican President
Vicente Fox, with whom Bush meets this week in Cancun, had hoped his friendship with the former Texas governor would lead to legal status for Mexicans working illegally in the U.S.

Any bill produced by the Senate would have to be reconciled with the House measure. Despite Bush's support for letting illegal immigrants with jobs avoid deportation, many Republicans vow to prevent what they say amounts to amnesty from becoming law.

"I will oppose amnesty at all stages," said Sen. John Cornyn (news, bio, voting record), R-Texas, who was on the losing side of Monday's 12-6 vote by the Judiciary Committee. He said Congress "made a mistake in 1986" by granting amnesty to 3 million illegal immigrants "and now we have 12 million."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Amnesty or no amnesty
when Bush's rich rancher and farmer friends need cheap labor that can be intimidated, they'll be all too eager to hire someone who does NOT jump through the hoops of whatever bill makes it out of Congress. Then, in another twenty years, we'll be having a national debate about legalizing THOSE people.


I can accept that America is completely hypocritical about this issue. I heard all the crap surrounding the Simpson-Mazzoli bill two decades ago, how it would say, "OK, you folks can stay, but no more will be allowed in." I really don't care if my taxes are paying for illegals to go through the health care system, the law enforcement system, and the education systems for free.


I just want to know, if we're dead set on eliminating the border between Mexico and the US, why can't we do it between the US and Canada? I'd like to be able to visit British Columbia, and come back without having to pay for a fucking passport, like I've been used to doing. If we're not going to treat border jumpers on the southerly margin of this country like criminals, why should we treat tourists coming back through our northern border as suspected terrorists?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. So, where's the provision fining/jailing companies...
...that exploit said labor (which is who really should be punished, not the immigrants, since it's those who exploit that undercut both immigrants and non and feed the influx of immigrant labor)?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. This is fabulous news
McCain/Kennedy is the only serious bill out there which looks at immigration as a complex issue for which a multi-faceted, comprehensive approach is needed, not just more bully boys with guns and more prisons. For those of you enforcement fans, it does include the big guys with guns as well, its strength is that enforcement is not its only focus. It's a very serious, well-researched, and carefully thought-out piece of legislation which really tries to learn from what we've done right and what we've done wrong in the past and to incorporate those lessons learned. It's consequently the only bill which has a shot at actually improving the situation as opposed to simply making a bad situation worse. This is really a cause celebre, people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. I did not expect this from a Republican but...
Edited on Tue Mar-28-06 02:58 PM by AlphaCentauri
.....but the speech of Senator Lindsey Graham was great.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm still concerned
I am just suspicious when I find myself on the same side as the Chamber of Commerce, the Neocons, and Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC