Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.N., Swiss Call Small-Arms Meeting, U.S. Not Invited

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:35 PM
Original message
U.N., Swiss Call Small-Arms Meeting, U.S. Not Invited

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=1838237&C=navwar

U.N., Swiss Call Small-Arms Meeting, U.S. Not Invited

The United Nations and the Swiss government said on May 31 they were calling a high-level international meeting next week on armed violence and development -- but the United States was not invited.

The gathering of ministers and senior representatives from some 48 countries aims to launch a world-wide effort to cut the gun crime and conflict hitting the economies of poorer nations, U.N. and Swiss officials told a news conference.


...

But the United States -- which has backed U.N. efforts to control the global trade in illicit weaponry but had stood aloof from other recent arms control pacts including one on land mines -- was not on the list of invitees, he told the news conference.
Invitations had gone out, he said, "to all those countries very committed to addressing this issue."

"But," he added, "I think ultimately that is why the United States is not invited -- it has to be countries that have shown a commitment on these issues ... We want to create this dynamic core group that can take this issue forward."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess they figure we're a rogue nation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bolton is NRA & wants to extend USA's nutty gun regs to rest of the world
USA's gun regs are as discredited to the civilized world as our healthcare system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. They know appealing to the U.S. under Bush is useless
W has never met a weapon, conventional or nuclear, that he didn't embrace. It's the macho cowboy thing...from the frat brat who attendend prep school in New England, where he was born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Well, that, and we're the number one arms dealers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good for us, The day I allow the U.N. and the Swiss too dictate U.S gun
Edited on Thu Jun-01-06 01:25 AM by seriousstan
laws..............



IS THE DAY THEY PRY MY COLD DEAD HANDS>>>>>>>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Straw man. No one said they would dictate anything to the US
Irrelevant. This is an international summit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
afrosia Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. I'd trust the UN and the Swiss way more than Bush.

Don't knock the Swiss. They have gun regs that work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is great, now if more than ONE online Military News site would...
...report this too....

The RW sites must be waiting for the distorted UPI version.:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good move. The UN should move to Hague & expel the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Good idea
I just wish the ICC would abandon any policy for the US to be immuned from punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. why invite someone to a party that hates you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. The US under Bush hasn't been aloof. It has been hostile.
The Bush administration has consistenly opposed collective security accords
especially those under the U.N. They especially oppose provisions that
would restrict non-state actors' access to guns.

It is unfortunate, but the U.S. does not have a constructive role to play here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. The NRA has managed to conflate legal ownership of a gun with the
protection of vicious, criminal arms dealers and war profiteers all over the world, and one has to wonder why. It's very similar to the conflation of an individual's human and civil rights with those of corporations. For instance, in California, the infamous Proposition 13 was supposed to protect old people from losing their homes to tax re-assessments, but in truth ended up hugely benefiting corporate landowners, who never die--they just accumulate more and more property, to ever more powerful mega-corps, who now pay little or no property tax. The interest of small property owners was conflated with the interests of Chevron and Bank of America and the L.A. Times, et al. It's a good bet that the money behind the NRA is in gun running and the illicit arms trade. It's not just sales of hand guns or hunting rifles that they're interested in--but rather protection and promotion of massive movements of weapons (small and large, including WMD), the militarization of every conflict, and the NEED (or perceived need) for more and more weapons of every kind.

From local US gun dealers and arms bazaars all the way up to Cheney's dirty weapons/nuke dealings worldwide, war profiteering is the signature of the Bush regime. Little wonder they have no interest in controlling any part of it. They are permitting war profiteers to dictate US policy. They ARE war profiteers. They PREFER a country and a world that is violent, chaotic, ruled by "might makes right," and easy to bully and bludgeon into submission. The Bush Cartel attitude toward arms control is exemplified by their treatment of the CIA's counter-proliferation network that they "outed" in 2003. They would just as soon see our counter-proliferation agents/contacts around the world killed off, to clear the field for illicit arms dealings.

I'm glad to see the Swiss leading this effort to curtail at least small arms trade. They have a tradition of what we would call "militia men"--every household with a rifle--based on their very vulnerable geographic position in Europe, the idea being that the Alpines would prevent mass assault on them, and the rifle in every household would take care of the rest. (The idea of civil militia goes way back to Machiavelli--that oft-maligned political thinker--who gave Thomas Jefferson and Co. the notion of citizens being able to defend their communities and states against TYRANNY--it was a way of separating citizens' rights and responsibilities from 'the king,' and instilling civic virtue--pride in your own independence, and being able to defend your independence against any outside interference; and grew out of the Italian independent city-states of the 15th century, the fairly democratic (merchant/middle class-controlled) entities where the Renaissance and many of our ideas about democracy were born.)

So the Swiss are deeply attached to the notion of individual gun ownership. In Switzerland, individual gun ownership is very nearly equivalent to BEING a citizen. Also, the Swiss undoubtedly have massive investment in arms. I don't know details on this, but the Swiss talent for precision instruments, and of course their huge investment funds, make it highly likely. So, WHO is militarizing every conflict in Africa? WHO is turning traditional tribal warfare into heinous paroxysms of genocide, by arming all sides? That is ONE consequence of the arms trade. And it is very likely European, including Swiss, arms manufacturers and peddlers, who are moving this trade and hugely profiting from it. The US is not the only bad actor in the weapons trade. The odds against the UN/Switzerland being able to curtail this highly lucrative, deadly trade are not good. I hope they succeed. Typically, the US is on the WRONG SIDE AGAIN. Will we ever again see a US government that tries to do the right thing?*

-----------------

*Throw Diebold and ES&S election theft machines into 'Boston Harbor' NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. No, IANSA is the one doing that...
The NRA has managed to conflate legal ownership of a gun with the protection of vicious, criminal arms dealers and war profiteers all over the world, and one has to wonder why.

No, actually IANSA, the NGO that essentially runs the conference, is the one doing that. They are the ones trying to incorporate language in the July 4th UN small arms conference to restrict the lawful CIVILIAN ownership and use of firearms.

Don't take my word for it, go straight to IANSA's web site and see for yourself. Some excerpts:

http://www.iansa.org/members/IANSA-media-briefing-low-res.pdf

2. Regulation of civilian ownership of weapons

(snip)

Governments should agree to:

• Promote gun owner responsibility by requiring all firearms to be
registered. Individuals permitted to own guns and ammunition
must be held to account for their security, use and misuse.

• Define minimum criteria for private ownership of guns with
a national system of licensing. These should include proven
capacity to handle a gun safely; knowledge of the relevant law;
age limit; proof of valid reason; and a security screening based on
criminal record or history of violence, including intimate partner
violence. Licences should also be required for ammunition.

• Prohibit civilian possession of military-style rifles, including semiautomatic rifles that can be converted to fully automatic fire and semi-automatic variants of military weapons.

• Introduce safe storage requirements to prevent gun accidents,
suicide, misuse and theft.


The IANSA agenda document also includes these gems:

Elements of effective national gun laws: an example from Australia

• Gun ownership should require a licence obtained by meeting a series of criteria which include a minimum age, a clean criminal record, undergoing safety training and establishing a genuine reason for needing to own a gun.

• All guns must be registered at time of sale or transfer and when the licence is renewed.

• There is a 28-day waiting period to buy a gun.

• ‘Genuine reason’ must be proved separately for each gun, effectively imposing a limit on the number that any one person can own.

• Guns cannot be bought or sold privately but only through licensed dealers or the police.

• There are strict requirements on how guns must be stored.


That is COMPLETELY unacceptable to American gun owners, whether Dem or indie or repub. Fuhgetaboudit.

I should point out that the head of IANSA is the individual who brought sweeping gun confiscation to Australia, and she has made it explicitly clear that she intends to bring it here.

It's a good bet that the money behind the NRA is in gun running and the illicit arms trade. It's not just sales of hand guns or hunting rifles that they're interested in--but rather protection and promotion of massive movements of weapons (small and large, including WMD), the militarization of every conflict, and the NEED (or perceived need) for more and more weapons of every kind.

No need to speculate; look it up for yourself. The NRA's money comes primarily from annual membership dues and contributions from individual gun owners; corporate donations are a very small piece of the pie and come mostly from companies that do NOT sell arms to foreign governments or combatants (most don't even make military weapons at all).

This conference would not be in the LEAST bit controversial had IANSA not declared war on civilian gun ownership in the United States. The July 4th conference has very little to do with Lord-of-War-style arms smuggling, and very much to do with bringing Aussie-style gun confiscation to the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. they just don't trust this government no more
I don't blame them I don't even trust this sick regime neither.

I hate Bush co.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. The chickens wouldn't invite the foxes into the hen house, would they?
No sense inviting the number one arms dealer in the world to a meeting on stopping the arms trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC