Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An airing of the NSA spying program

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
djg21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:20 AM
Original message
An airing of the NSA spying program
An airing of the NSA spying program
07:04 PM | Lyle Denniston | Comments (0)

A federal judge has ordered the Justice Department to make a legal defense in a public court hearing of the National Security Agency's program of communications monitoring during the war on terrorism -- a program under challenge in federal courts across the nation. Senior U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor of Detroit on Wednesday denied a Department request to put off a hearing on the merits of a legal challenge in her Court until after she had ruled on the government's claim that the case must be dismissed based on the "state secrets privilege."

That is a significant rebuff to the Department's efforts, now spread out in a number of cases, to put a swift end to claims in court that President Bush acted illegally and unconstitutionally in authorizing the NSA, after the 2001 terrorist attacks, to monitor calls or e-mails suspected of being to or from terrorists. . In fact, the Detroit judge's order is such a serious setback that the Justice Department might be expected to try to challenge it with an immediate appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court, and perhaps to the Supreme Court. Judge Taylor's action amounted to significantly more than a case-management order.


Follow the link to SCOTUSblog for more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Call me cynical, but ...
I'm sure a hearing like this was in the cards. The administration will give some backwards justification which the court deems acceptable, and then whenever someone questions the NSA's activities, they will refer to our mighty legal system having given them permission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If a judge deems it acceptable, all bets are off.
But if that was going to happen so easily, why is the administration fighting so hard to not give a judge an opportunity to consider the issue?

Well, because the judge isn't a sure thing, I imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Who is Bush really afraid of?
Does he lie awake at night thinking about Nixon? Or does he sleep well knowing that the puppet masters have got everything under control?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. And why should Congress skate
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 11:18 AM by ShockediSay
past probable cause-based search warrants for crooked dealings while honest politically active citizens are subject to secret police warrantless spying and data gathering? For all we know, the results of this big brother spying ends up in the hands of insurance companies, phone bank jammers, vote count finaglers, Karl Rove and other corporofascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC