Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ruppersberger (D) pitches new plan on Iraq to the Pentagon after visit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:13 PM
Original message
Ruppersberger (D) pitches new plan on Iraq to the Pentagon after visit
Rep. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, who returned Sunday from his fourth visit to Iraq, said the troops should be moved to the perimeters of Baghdad and other Iraqi cities, “where they can be ready to assist Iraqi forces but make the Iraqis realize they can’t be dependent on us.”

Declaring that insurgents and foreign jihadists “are killing us with and suicide bombs because we’re on their turf and are not able to protect our troops,” Ruppersberger said that patrolling the perimeter of urban areas “would break the dependency the Iraqi military has on the American military. “This never will happen until we do that,” he said. “I don’t see any reason to keep patrolling the cities.

At the same time, Ruppersberger said he called on Iraq’s new government to order its 300,000-man army to take responsibility for patrolling the cities, where the bulk of deadly attacks on the U.S. military, Iraqi forces and civilians have occurred. Ruppersberger said both the U.S. commanders and Iraqi leaders, including Prime Minister Nouri Kamal al-Maliki, reacted favorably to his proposal.

“The generals told me that they can start implementing this except for certain areas,” which he declined to identify. He said his proposal, which he has also communicated to the White House and the Pentagon, “could have a lot of positive consequences. We could go after al Qaeda and focus on where the IEDs and suicide bombs are being made and who’s bringing them in.

http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/060806/iraq.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another moronic idea in a LONG string of imbecilic ideas.
Hey, remember how in Viet Nam, we'd have the artillery firebases, and between them, they'd cover ever inch of ground, and we'd be able to blow up the Cong and NVA wherever they were?

Worked out pretty well, didn't it?

This idea is just about as brilliant as that one.

I give the fuck up.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wouldn't we laugh our fucking arses off if CHINA inaded us...
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 09:20 PM by LynnTheDem
and after years of us fighting back (who the fuck wouldn't fight invaders??? Other than the boot-lickiing rightwingnuts, that is) China declared they had to "break American dependancy on us".

America, you're breeding far too many stupid MFers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. We still have to run supply convoys to supply our bases.
A lot of the attacks on US troops are on the supply convoys that run ammo, fuel, water, food, etc. to our bases. If we give up the cities that will only let the insurgents concentrate on attacking our supply lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC