Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Appeals court sides with Bush on wiretap issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 03:37 PM
Original message
Appeals court sides with Bush on wiretap issue
Edited on Fri Jun-09-06 04:21 PM by cal04
A divided federal appeals court Friday sided with the Bush administration over rules that make it easier for police and the FBI to wiretap Internet phone calls. In a 2-1 ruling, the court said the Federal Communications Commission was correct when it decided that providers of Internet phone service and broadband services have legal obligations similar to those of telephone companies.

The FCC was responding to Justice Department complaints that companies must ensure their equipment using new technologies can accommodate police wiretaps under the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, known as CALEA. We cannot set aside the commission’s reasonable interpretation of the act in favor of an alternatively plausible or an even better one,” wrote appeals court judge David Sentelle.

Judge Harry Edwards said the law contains an exemption for information services and that the FCC “has altogether gutted” it. In determining that broadband Internet providers are subject to the act just as telecommunications carriers are, the FCC “apparently forgot to read the words of the statute,” Edwards wrote in dissent.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13227866/

A Court Sides With White House on Wiretaps
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Appeals-Court-FBI.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ugh. Janice Rogers Brown
Edited on Fri Jun-09-06 04:14 PM by Charlie Brown
"Sentelle is an appointee of President Reagan, Judge Janice Rogers Brown, who sided with Sentelle, is an appointee of President George W. Bush. Edwards was appointed by President Carter."

It's hard believe some conservatives wanted her on the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. crooks, all of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. uhm, please remind me
Why do we have courts??

And, when you're done explaining that, can you explain why we need a legislative branch?

Thanks. I'm new to this American citizenship stuff. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is for wiretapping with warrants, right?
It doesn't seem to involve the NSA spying issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. that sucks, but it does make sense they should be consistent for
phone companies no matter which style technology is being used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. grrrr.
probably was not 9th circuit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Federal appeals court sides with Bush on wire tapping
Full story here


By PETE YOST

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal appeals court sided with the Bush administration Friday on an electronic surveillance issue, making it easier to tap into Internet phone calls and broadband transmissions.

The court ruled 2-1 in favor of the Federal Communications Commission, which says equipment using the new technologies must be able to accommodate police wiretaps under the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, known as CALEA.

Judge David Sentelle called the agency's reading of the law a reasonable interpretation. In dissent, Judge Harry Edwards said the FCC gutted an exemption for information services that he said covered the Internet and broadband.

The FCC "apparently forgot to read the words of the statute," Edwards wrote.

FCC chairman Kevin Martin said the decision ensures that law enforcement's ability to conduct court-ordered electronic surveillance will keep pace with new technology.

Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, primary sponsor of CALEA, called the court's decision contrary to congressional intent, saying it stretches a law written for "the telephone system of 1994 to cover the Internet of 2006."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenergy Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Translation: Federal Appeals Court Activist Judges
are jumping on the fascist bandwagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanstaafl28 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. So Ignoring the RULE OF LAW is legal now?
Hell, we should all join the party and just do whatever we damn well please then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idioteque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. Reagan appointee and Janice Rogers Brown side with Bush
Carter appointee dissents. Nobody could have predicted that. :/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. Appeals Court Sides With White House on Wiretaps--WaPo
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/09/AR2006060900864.html?referrer=email

Appeals Court Sides With White House on Wiretaps

By Kim Hart
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, June 10, 2006; D01



Companies that provide Web-based telecommunications services must allow wiretapping by law enforcement officials, a federal appeals court ruled yesterday.

The ruling upholds a Federal Communications Commission decision that companies such as Vonage Holdings Corp., the country's largest provider of Internet phone service, are under the same legal obligation as telephone companies. The requirement for a wiretap-compatible system could mean higher expenses for broadband service companies, and it marks the further spread of regulation into Internet phone services.

The FCC issued its ruling based on Justice Department concerns that new technology would not accommodate police wiretaps under the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, known as CALEA.

Judge David B. Sentelle, writing for a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, said that the FCC "offered a reasonable interpretation" of the law.


THERE'S A LOT MORE TO THIS ARTICLE--IT'S IMPORTANT, IT'S TECHNICAL, AND IT'S SCARY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Phone companies have always been allowed to tap their own lines.
It stands to reason the Government could then subpeona phone records with a court order. A little OT but worth mentioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. David Sentelle again
This time joined by the hack Janice Rogers Brown. One lies and the other swears to it, and hey presto! The Fourth Amendment disappears!

Sentelle, who overturned the convictions of Oliver North and John Poindexter. Sentelle, who over and over again granted Kenneth Starr leave to expand his investigation. Sentelle, who as a judge met privately with and provided advice to Republican lawyers who had business before him. Sentelle, poster boy for Republican corruption.

Somehow, I'll bet none of that quite found its way into the Washington Post's report on this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Senators Wyden and Nelson voted to put Janice Rogers Brown
on that court, and she cast a critical vote in support of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC