Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Agencies: Homegrown radicals inside U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 03:56 PM
Original message
Agencies: Homegrown radicals inside U.S.

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/14807839.htm

Agencies: Homegrown radicals inside U.S.

WASHINGTON - U.S. counterterrorism officials say they are uncovering homegrown Islamic radicals inside the United States who lack formal ties to al-Qaida and operate independently.

Those independent qualities - combined with the radicals' ability to organize and plot on the Internet - make them particularly difficult to disrupt, retired Vice Adm. John Scott Redd, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Tuesday.

...

Redd pointed to what he said were three potential homegrown organizations that have been disrupted in the U.S. in just over a year:

_ Two Atlanta-area men, charged earlier this year in a terrorism case, have been publicly linked to some of the Canadian suspects. Prosecutors have said the two traveled to Washington to shoot "casing videos" of the Capitol and other potential targets. The lawyer for one suspect has insisted it wasn't part of any terrorism plot.

_ In Torrance, Calif., the head of a radical Islamic prison gang and three others were indicted last year on federal charges of planning terrorist attacks against U.S. military facilities, the Israeli Consulate and other Los Angeles-area targets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. They have limits in what they can do.
I've been thinking. They're small in number so unless they get something like another airplane, they have limits in the control that they would need to have in order to launch another attack.

Things like the White House, Congress, etc. are safe primarily because they all have small armies guarding them; more manpower than the terrorists will ever be able to get together. Any attempts in that direction are doomed to sure failure. I expect the Canadian Parliament was in the same position which, to me at least, sort of tells me how ridiculous the Canadian "terrorists" were.

The way I see it, They're going to be looking for situations small enough to enable them to control a key aspect but big enough for maximum damage and that's going to be difficult. If the FBI would stop wasting their time on all these red herrings (see Canada and Atlanta), it wouldn't be as much of a problem. That's why I just don't see any terrorists directly attacking a U.S. military facility on its own ground either. I think that's just another red herring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC