Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US-led coalition sending more than 11,000 troops against Taliban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:16 PM
Original message
US-led coalition sending more than 11,000 troops against Taliban
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 05:54 PM by Charlie Brown
http://www.newspress.com/Top/Article/article.jsp?Section=WORLD&ID=564751834204734935

MUSA QALA, Afghanistan (AP) - The U.S.-led coalition is unleashing more than 11,000 troops to attack militants in the southern mountains of Afghanistan, the biggest offensive since the fall of the Taliban in 2001.

The force of more than 11,000 troops is by far the largest deployed in Afghanistan for one operation since the 2001 invasion. Previous offensives in the country have involved several thousand soldiers.

Conditions permitting, Thursday will mark what the military is calling the start of major and decisive anti-Taliban operations lasting through the summer. Reconstruction projects will also play a major role in Mountain Thrust.

Operation Mountain Thrust will involve about 2,300 U.S. conventional and special forces, 3,300 British troops, 2,200 Canadians, about 3,500 Afghan soldiers and air support troops, Freakley said. There will also be coalition air support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought we put them out of action 4 years ago and paraded our triumph?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "military operation in Afghanistan in the past four years"
It's beginning to sound a lot like the Soviets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Money, money, money! Halliburton will be happy, but where will the
money come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Taliban are getting too close to Haliburton's oil pipeline in
Afganistan. Can't have them blowing up Cheney's retirement. Bush is going in to kill them all now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Soviets had ten times that many
And that wasn't even close to enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. US troops to lead major attack on Taliban (Guardian)
An American led force of 11,000 troops will launch the biggest offensive against the Taliban since 2001 tomorrow.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,,1797387,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ever get the feeling that the "taliban" is a major portion of the
population in afghanistan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Substitute "Viet Cong" for "Taliban" and 1966 for 2006 -- history
repeats itself, the first time as tragedy, the second as farce

Karl Marx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. REDUX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'm surprised we have that many troops still available there. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Of course
many of the people now running the country with the blessings of the US are former warlords just as vile as the Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC